I Rejected Harvard

I grew up on the East Coast playing played water polo with men and boys on a club team in a mid-Atlantic state. In my mid-teens, my parents flew me up the Eastern seaboard to get experience playing with women on a New York college club team. We played in tournaments against Princeton, Harvard, Brown and a few other schools. Along the way my athletic ability brought me to the attention of the Harvard water polo coach. He wanted me to play for his team.

The high school I attended was ranked one of the best public schools in the nation. I was honors this and that and took a few AP classes. My grades were decent; my SAT’s good, not great.

Back in the day, the interview with alumnae was a heavily weighted part of the application process. Harvard set me up with an alumnae married couple, both attorneys, in my town.

Despite my naturally friendly and outgoing personality, this husband and wife were not impressed with my accomplishments or me. They barely made eye contact as they poured over my transcripts, their expressions mirror images of disbelief and disdain.

“How did you even get an interview with us?” the wife asked.
“You’re not Harvard material,” the husband said.

I was unfazed. I’d met these two before. The suburbs of Washington D.C. were full of ultra-competitive, workaholic, eggheads. I’d babysat for their kids. I’d met their incarnations in my friend’s parents.

“Water polo coach wants me,” I explained. “They’re building their team.”

I had no doubt they would try to sabotage my chances in their evaluation.

I also knew it made no difference. The coach could easily pull me in. I’d be an asset on his fledgling team whereas I’d barely start at one of the powerhouse women’s water polo teams in California.

As I left their McMansion and got into my parents’ old station wagon I wasn’t worried about not fitting in at an Ivy League school. I wasn’t concerned about the academic rigors. I certainly didn’t share any of their concerns about my ability to ‘hack it’ at the number one college in the country nor did I give much thought to the loans I’d be taking on.

What gave me pause was their lack of empathy. Did an ultra-competitive environment create that kind of person? If so, I was in trouble. I wasn’t competitive with my peers academically, but I was insanely competitive in the pool. Were they representative of what the combination of success, supposed intellectual superiority and privilege did to people? Would my own ego inflate to outsized proportions dragging the “My-name-is-Kate-and-I-went-to- Harvard” moniker behind me the rest of my life?

I wrote a letter withdrawing my application from Harvard University the next day and hoped I’d be accepted into one of the University of California schools I’d applied to.

In the three decades since I graduated from the University of California I’ve been able to take risks without the burden of astronomical school loans (Harvard didn’t give athletic scholarships). I’ve worked as a firefighter/paramedic, started a successful small business, had a few novels published and raised a family. I’ve maintained my optimism and empathy and have no regrets.

Kate
UC

This story is so sweet :). I’m glad you chose to make the difficult decision of “rejecting” Harvard because of their competitiveness. This just shows how Harvard isn’t everything - there are many great schools out there, and it really just depends on what you want to surround yourself with.

Wow, interesting!

Obviously, the cost comparison was different three decades ago. Back then, UCs were not that expensive even for out-of-state students, and it was long before Harvard’s super-generous financial aid policy.

I love, love, love this story. Good for you, and I’m happy your life is going well! :slight_smile:

This is a wonderful story for a variety of reasons…but
I would point out that the UC system of thirty years ago is not the same system. I say that as a proud UCSC graduate.
My son was fortunate enough to be recruited to an Ivy League school and our income is such that he received generous FA. He is very fortunate to have this amazing opportunity. Unfortunately if he had applied and been accepted to a UC he would be saddled with debt in order to attend.
I truly hope my fine Cali state can get a hold of this problem so that stories such as yours can continue to be the experience students have in the UCs.
P.S. Also met some pretty jerky Cal students in my time who probably are just as elietist as those Harvard types you mentioned :wink:

I think that McMansions are a more recent development.- they were first written about around 1990 or so. But I’m sorry the couple was so unpleasant. .

What everybody else said.

But I also love that you’ve been a firefighter!

There were McMansions 35 years ago?
Actually I’m surprised that anyone would let 2 grads represent the totality of a 380 year old school with 14,000 students on campus. H is not the Nirvana that some on these boards fantasize, but it does have a rich mosaic of interesting kids, and I never saw snobbery as a dominant trait. But glad it worked out for you in California.

I shared a house with a couple of Harvard grads after I graduated and started working. They were pretty fun, normal, down-to-earth people. In fact they probably fit closer to the UC Berkeley stereotype in my head than Harvard. I also recall my Harvard interviewer being a pretty normal guy (as much as a 17 year old high schooler can distinguish between normal adults anyway).

Anyway, glad things worked out for OP.

No, there were no McMansions 35 years ago and no one used that term. Did you copy this from a website someplace?

Anyway, so you rejected Harvard. So? People do that.

Nice story and very pleased to hear it all worked out so well in the end.

That said, there’s something disturbingly myopic and innumerate about judging a school based on a sample size of two, as if there are no alumni of your UC who would behave like the Harvard couple. There are literally no schools on earth that haven’t matriculated and graduated jerks and boors. None.

As hard as it may be for some to fathom, plenty of students reject Harvard. The daughter of neighbors (both H and W are Harvard grads and lovely, fun people) rejected Harvard in favor of UNC Chapel Hill where she was a Robertson Scholar. She did end up at Harvard Law though.

Indeed. Harvard’s yield rate is a robust 81%, but that means that 19% of admitted students choose not to matriculate.

This is not a rare event. I personally know a number of athletic recruits who rejected HYP and S. I actually spent a few hours trying to persuade a parent not to do it and was told no. Obviously I would not make a successful used car salesman. Often it is about money but not always.

I’m happy for OP but things could’ve worked out worse, similar or better. He would never know. Sometimes we underestimate ourselves and get afraid of competition because some jerks pour doubts in our minds. I too enrolled in a pretty mediocre place because I thought that my mediocre ESL skills weren’t good enough for the top Anerican college I was accepted into.

Seems like your interviewers were very rude to you. Glad that you made a different choice and that you are happy with how it all worked out.

However, as silly as it is to define yourself by where you went to college, it’s even more silly to define yourself by where you didn’t go.

Remember what they say - if you’re writing essays 30 years later about how you rejected Harvard, then the Harvardians will have already won :wink:

P.S. Check your dates about when these schools started their women’s water polo teams before writing your next essay.

<i’ve maintained="" my="" optimism="" and="" empathy="" have="" no="" regrets.=""></i’ve>

30 years had passed, but you still can’t let it go and try to set the score with your past. Why had you write this post? If you have no regrets, you would forget this story long, long time ago, like a bad date with some long-gone boyfriend. If you still have to make a tread about it … it means that this story means a lot for you.

I fail to see the point of this thread.

Very nice short story. Except that alumni interviewers don’t “pour” [sic] over the applicant’s transcript. A for effort, though.