"Ignore college statistics" Philly Enquirer Op/Ed sanity check

<p>…or “Numbers of applicants are up, but so are the opportunities - especially at small colleges.”</p>

<p>as admittedly a purveyor of sometimes crazy admissions statistics, its nice to hear a rational opinion every once in a while.</p>

<p>[Ignore</a> college statistics | Philadelphia Inquirer | 02/19/2008](<a href=“http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/pa/20080219_Ignore_college_statistics.html]Ignore”>Ignore college statistics)</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>eratta:-- I apologize for incorrectly spelling “Inquirer” in the title…can’t edit the title once posted.</p>

<p>This is a good expression of an attitude that is pretty ubiquitous at all of the Quaker day schools in this area. 31% to LACs at Friends Central (where the author teaches) actually seems low in comparison to where the other schools send kids.</p>

<p>This article seems to have two main points, and can’t decide what to focus on. It’s trying to simultaneously express how colleges across the board have better resources and opportunities than they used to, and to be a paean to LACs (an attitude that, on this board, would seem to be preaching to the choir).</p>

<p>While I am glad that there are so many good LACs out there for people who want them, I get tired of hearing this idea that the “best” undergrad programs are the ones that only have undergrads, where you can be a big fish in a little pond, and where everybody knows everybody. That’s the best for some. Not for others. It always depends on what you want and value in your college education.</p>

<p>I would think that many students who attended a high school as small as the one the author teaches at (less than 100 students in each graduating class) might want to attend a bigger college or university, instead of a small LAC. It might be too much of the same for many of them. My daughter loves her small LAC but she attended a huge “factory-like” high school in which the graduating class was twice the size of her college class. In her high school, she had to take her own initiative to get involved or find opportunities for herself, very different than the atmosphere of a small private school. She has stated that if she had attended a tiny private school, she would not have wanted to attend a tiny college as well.</p>

<p>EDIT - To the OP: It is the Philadelphia INQUIRER, not ENQIRER. I think you are confusing it with the National Enquirer :eek:</p>

<p>I agree with you completely, jessie, but then I am not an actual Quaker, just someone who sometimes hangs around with them. Within a Quaker value system – and the Quaker schools absolutely reflect a Quaker value system – small scale and intimacy are not just one of many alternative methods for educating students, to be judged on their educational effectiveness and fit for a particular person. They have substantive moral importance. They are preconditions for creating the kind of spiritual community that people should join. So, yes, they really think LACs are “better” (not that it keeps anyone from applying to Harvard).</p>

<p>You would be surprised – at least I am – at how many kids are perfectly happy to go to college some place that resembles their high school. Their high schools are awfully nice places. Of course, not everyone makes that choice, and some rebel strongly against it. But lots embrace it.</p>

<p>Plus, it works, from an economic standpoint. Believe me, it’s LOTS easier to have great success in college placement if “success” is defined by reference to 30-40 colleges rather than 10-15. The schools have a strong interest in making certain everyone in their community agrees with that.</p>