<p>I’m planning to take the ACT again on Oct. 24th. I recently bought 3 books. The books are:</p>
<p>Barron’s 36
McGraw Hill 2010 ACT Review
Princeton 1296 ACT Problems</p>
<p>In what order should I use the books?</p>
<p>I’m planning to take the ACT again on Oct. 24th. I recently bought 3 books. The books are:</p>
<p>Barron’s 36
McGraw Hill 2010 ACT Review
Princeton 1296 ACT Problems</p>
<p>In what order should I use the books?</p>
<p>Princeton 1296 ACT
Barron’s 36
Mcgraw hill</p>
<p>This is in the order of how much you’ll actually learn from the books.</p>
<p>It depends. Skim the books and see which one appeals to you most. Everyone gains their own opinion on it. If you like the author’s style and the structure, use it first.
Personally, I think B/P/Mc is my order.</p>
<p>I heard McGraw Hill was horrible, but that is just from others opinions since I have not used it. I’d say these lists are solid above me.</p>
<p>Yeah, I would agree with Salve!..Mc was pretty crappy, hence it being the 3rd out of 3</p>
<p>Ha, anything with “Mc” at the beginning sucks. McDonald’s, Tim McGraw, McGraw Hill, McJobs…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>HAHA, so very true… McDonald’s went downhill</p>
<p>Gosh, I wish you wouldn’t have bought Mcgraw Hill, to to its major suckiness. It looks so innocent in theory, but is ■■■■■■■■ in practice.</p>
<p>Just get what you can out of it (maybe do everything if you can), then use 1296 to give you a big wakeup call on how hard the test really is. Then, do Barron’s 36 since it has some very advanced advice.</p>