Indian Thread

International Students
5241

<p>merc… this could be your ticket (well, maybe)</p>

<p>don’t pass up the opportunity
do it just to teach JUIT a lesson atleast</p>

5242

<p>~FT:
“i think it was me who said that, but anyways it is SOo true.”</p>

<p>Adi had said it again once we were at the CSTerminal, maybe he was quoting you FT, but he added more to your words.
Last things last in memory.</p>

<p>~“describe shabin- slightly idealistic(?)”</p>

<p>Physics deals with Ideal/perfect scenarios for the most part, and it is engineering that de-idealizes them and puts things into the perspective of reality. And the tool for this is nothing but Mathematics - a very powerful tool and asset in the hands/mind of one who knows it, a useless burden for the one who doesn’t know it.</p>

<p>As for Idealism in persona is concerned, there are issues that must be viewed, interpreted and analysed through a prism of idealism so as to disperse it into the proper wavelengths. FT, you pointed out the reality prevailing in the case of Child-Labour, but then isn’t there any other way to alleviate the causes which are not a choosing by those children?</p>

<p>~“i am extremely flattered to be described as “hansome” & “cute” (hahaha)
but chubby!!! zaftig!!! w t f!!!”</p>

<p>The truth sometimes flatters some, and at other times it flattens them!</p>

<p>~“dude, if you thought those chicks were “explosive” you’ve seen nothing… seriously”</p>

<p>I don’t want to see things that may pop my eyes out.
If it you are serious about the <code>nothing’ , I may like to see</code>something’!</p>

<p>~SHABIN:
“Ft said that two men holding hands in an open place can have no other meaning except that they are gays”</p>

<p>In the presence of Ft, do take care while shaking hands with others in his view. </p>

<br>

<br>

<p>=== S H A B I N ===========</p>

5243

<p>lol flame ur crazy :stuck_out_tongue: ticket? :smiley:
BTW the text is from last year’s admissions pages, which is no more. MIT replaced it with a brandnew MyMIT portal this year.
And come on I posted only cuz I found it amusing…</p>

5244

<p>haha that was shabin. seriously dude :D</p>

5245

<p>

come on guys it’s not like there are women SO gorgeous in mumbai that you’ll die just by looking…
I have a very tough grading system… scale of 1 to 10, and aishwarya gets a mere 8… :stuck_out_tongue: (and some of your usual suspects have lower than expected scores like bipasha 6, mallika 7.1, preity zinta 7, riya sen 7.8 etc…) alicia silverstone does get a 9!</p>

5246

<p>merc, how would you rate sandra bullock and elisabeth shue? juz curious</p>

5247

<p>oh my gradings are very stereotypical…
sandra bullock - 7
elisabeth shue - quick look on google, and it comes to 7.5
if you want another example of a hottie (= 8+), go to <a href=“http://www.moi-alizee.com%5B/url%5D”>www.moi-alizee.com</a></p>

<p>and you’re calling me by my full ID?</p>

<p>EDIT: hehe you shortened it to merc :p</p>

5248

<p>yes, it felt so odd to be calling you that, i had to change it :D</p>

<p>haha yeah i like alizee. moi lolita :p</p>

5249

<p>Perhaps neha can pair up HER selections with mine based on these ratings :p</p>

5250

<p>~mercurySquad:
“I have a very tough grading system…”</p>

<p>Your grading system is like the Indian School Grading System.
Else why would Aishwarya get an 8, whereas she deserves only 5.273/10.
Bipasha : 8/10. If you rotate 8 by either a positive or negative angle of Pi/2, you may find some associative resemblences.</p>

<p>~“it’s not like there are women SO gorgeous in mumbai that you’ll die just by looking.”</p>

<p>When was the last time you were in Bombay?
Okay, nobody dies by looking at a girl by all reasons. By the way, I am not the type of those who are pretty obsessed with girls and are after them.</p>

<p>=== S H A B I N ===========</p>

5251

<p>

Ok. I agree. :smiley:

Hmm that’s why she gets a 6. Bulk = sulk.</p>

5252

<p>on my scale</p>

<p>wow can’t belive i’m doing this</p>

<p>shue 9
sandra 9
alizee 7
silverstone 6
riya 6
mallika 6
ash 6
zinta 6
bipasha 5</p>

5253

<p>Haha astrix cool… ratings usually describe a person’s tastes pretty clearly.
Shabin, it’s your turn now :p</p>

5254

<p>ugh…this is an alltime low…I’m sleepy at 5 pm :(</p>

5255

<p>L-M-A-O</p>

<p>I read the sedna & you transcript… :smiley:
I can imagine…</p>

5256

<p>you are such a bully - I wonder how sedna tolerates you really :p</p>

<p>and we had yet another smiley conversation…smileys are seriously becoming like the weather :p</p>

5257

<p>~mercurySquad:
“Shabin, it’s your turn now”</p>

<p>I don’t know enough of them :-((
But, let me give it a try with the help of a friend.</p>

<h1>9-10</h1>

<p>Marilyn Monroe
Audrey Hepburn
Gene Tierney</p>

<h1>8-9</h1>

<p>Carmen Electra
Anne Hathway
Penelope Cruz</p>

<h1>7-8</h1>

<p>Keira Knightley
Madhubala
Sonali Bendre</p>

<h1>6-7</h1>

<p>Lindsay Lohan
Alizee
Gina Lee Nolin</p>

<h1>5-6</h1>

<p>Maria Sharapova
Nicole Kidman</p>

<h1>4-5</h1>

<p>Pamela Anderson
Aishwarya Rai</p>

<h1>3-4</h1>

<p>Anna Kournikova
Bipasha Basu</p>

<h1>2-3</h1>

<p>Mallika Sherawat
Jennifer Aniston
catherine bell</p>

<h1>1-2</h1>

<p>Cameron Diaz
Drew Barrimore</p>

<h1>0-1</h1>

<p>Raveena Tandon
Priyanka Chopra
Tanushree Dutta</p>

<p>=========================================
I would like thank my friend for helping me to put up such an exquisite list!
I don’t even know 60% of them and haven’t seen 50 % of them.</p>

<p>=== B B ===========</p>

5258

<p>awesome :smiley:
or as astrix would say zawesome :p</p>

5259

<p>

atrix: :clueless:</p>

<p>

merc :clueless:</p>

<p>wat sedna??
sorry fellas, i am super blur past few days…</p>

5260

<p>I dont like Shabin’s ratings :stuck_out_tongue:
Merc’s on the other hand is quite good :D</p>

<p>Btw has anyone bought Empire Earth 2 ??</p>