<p>Somewhere I read that Wharton places a huge emphasis on mathematics, since it is heavily used within finance and econ and well, everything. That being said, what is the difference between being someone who qualifies for the AIME and gets a 0, someone who gets a 3, and someone who gets double digits? </p>
<p>I believe that merely qualifying and doing a few of the earlier questions shows some recognizable mathematical ability, enough to handle the difficult work of Wharton. They may also act as indicators of problem solving ability (which I imagine would be very helpful, e.g. in OPIM). But what do others think about this, and about math competitions in general?</p>
<p>I ask primarily because of the people I know who attend Wharton, none of them competed in the AMC’s or other math competitions, with more liberal arts backgrounds.</p>