Interesting Article - "The academic version of hazing"

<p>Check out this article in the Inquirer - <a href=“http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/10140684.htm?1c[/url]”>http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/10140684.htm?1c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>The academic version of hazing</p>

<p>College application is rough enough without binding early-decision practices.</p>

<p>By Mark Franek</p>

<p>What do Oprah Winfrey, Steven Spielberg, and Microsoft cofounder Paul Gardner all have in common (besides about $23 billion)? That’s right - they all attended state-run universities.</p>

<p>I dig this fact out of my dean of students file every year around this time when our high school seniors are putting the finishing touches on their college applications, particularly those one-shot deals at early-decision schools.</p>

<p>In early-decision programs, students start their senior year ready to choose the one college they would most like to attend. They are allowed to make only one application, and it is usually due to the college in mid-November. College admissions officers then have about a month to deliberate and respond.</p>

<p>“April is the cruelest month,” according to poet T. S. Eliot - but then, Eliot didn’t teach high school seniors. For a fortunate few, thick envelopes arrive in the mail in mid-December, rolling out the red carpet to the college of their choice (complete with a binding contract so that students and their families can’t wait for more suitable - or cheaper - offers); for everyone else, it’s the thin letter and back into the pot with the rest of the regular applications, or worse, outright rejection.</p>

<p>I can’t tell you how many times I’ve witnessed tears of joy and jubilation, or real grief, in the halls during my 12 years as an educator. I’ve seen student-couples break up, students break down, friendships on the rocks. You’d think that getting into a preferred university was a life-or-death situation.</p>

<p>For those who get in early, an acceptance letter seems to confirm what they already know about themselves - that they are bright, motivated students, with lots of promise. (Usually, this confirmation is followed almost immediately by a marked decline in the amount of homework being performed, which continues to decline over the next six months.) For those who don’t get in, it’s back to the grindstone and the waiting game, which is new this time because the wait is accompanied by the vague sense that they weren’t quite good enough the first time around.</p>

<p>Who is responsible for this ludicrous situation may surprise you: The University of Pennsylvania and Princeton University - and you.</p>

<p>Schools such as Penn and Princeton - including a long list of less selective schools that take their cue from the Ivies - use early-decision programs to improve their overall yield (accepted students who ultimately matriculate in the fall), the average SAT score of their accepted students, and their selectivity rating. These all are variables that have dramatic and immediate positive effects in any popular ranking system, such as the pervasive and powerful one that appears each fall in U.S. News and World Report magazine. Any college president who says he or she doesn’t read or care about this report might have a degree from Princeton but also is lying.</p>

<p>Students, of course, don’t know that they are being manipulated and dramatically affected by a system that is all about marketing, money and power, which have little to do with getting a good education.</p>

<p>Students don’t really put much stock in the college rankings, to be honest, but their parents do. By the time the senior year rolls around, increasingly more parents have whipped up such a frenzy over the college admissions process that many kids think that the rest of their lives - indeed, their present self-worth - hinges on where they plan to attend college.</p>

<p>Early decision fans the flames of an already intense fire. The college admissions process, wrote psychologist Michael G. Thompson in a popular 1990 essay, “College Admissions as a Failed Rite of Passage,” “can make normal [parents] act nutty, and nutty [parents] act quite crazy.” I’ve heard outrageous stories of admissions officers being offered fruit baskets and stock options - all to gain entry to an attractive middle school. I can only imagine what is being proffered at the college level.</p>

<p>Where are high school teachers on the issue of college admissions? We’re on the sidelines, of course, watching a game that has changed dramatically over the years. College used to be about a few wonderful professors, a whole lot of books, and great friends. Since when did a few very selective schools develop a monopoly on those things, or on anyone’s future?</p>

<p>It’s time for colleges and universities to end their binding early-decision programs, for publications to stop listing colleges with numerals next to them, and for parents to reduce their anxiety about the whole college-decision process.</p>

<p>Any teacher worth his or her shiny apple knows that a student can get all A’s, go to the highest-ranked schools, and still fail life. Every child knows that it never mattered where his mother went to college. Why do parents, who were once children and always are teachers, forget this wisdom when they need it most?</p>

<p>Though I think it’s a bit hard on Ivy admission officers, I agree with some of his points. What do you think?</p>

<p>I agree with some of the points—I don’t like the U.S. News Rankings (or any rankings, for that matter) because they cause colleges to adopt policies/practices they wouldn’t normally put in place. I don’t mind ED, though. It’s useful for both the student and the college.</p>

<p>There was a time when ED was a win-win situation all around. A student had a clear first choice. He had loved College XYZ all of his life. Maybe it was Dad or Mom’s alma mater and he had been visiting the school since he was a baby. The school colors decorated the house, and everyone assumed he would be going there. Why wait until May before all of the details were ironed out? Get that app in early so the school could do a quick perusal and if all was well, a deal was struck. Everyone else needed to look at the colleges, compare the colleges and decide which ones to put on the list and needed time to ruminate. So noone really paid that much attention the the few ED kids in the pack. It was not part of any college strategy those days and most of us did not even have our apps out when that acceptance arrived for the EDer. Everyone knew he was going there anyways. And he did not take up a spot or consideration for all of the other selective schools since he only applied to one school.</p>

<p>These days, everyone seems to want to go the same colleges. You don’t have to be legacy to own Harvard paraphenalia. And the number of apps have skyrocketed to the most selective colleges. I think it is wonderful that the applicant pool has opened up the way it has. So it should be. But now ED has become a losers game for more people than it is a win-win situation. Yeah, those of us whose kid got in can exult and wear that sweatshirt to school and present the GC with the mug from HPY. But basically that pool is the mainly the pool of the priviliged–those who have enough info and resources to get that app out early. The binding agreements really are not for those who need financial aid. And kids are blindly picking the early schools not because it is the one and only but because they want to up the odd of getting into the “best” possible school. But looking at the numbers of how many are accepted, deferred, rejected, it seems to me that there are more losers than there are winners here. And the winners in the Single choice options can continue to apply to other schools to be superwinners rather than easing the congestion. Some will get an embarrassment of riches in April whereas there will be many disappointed again. The misery can be further prolonged to the waitlist. I don’t think it makes sense anymore, as much as it benefits those who do get in early. As for the EA options, who is benefitting from that other than the few kids who do get in? The colleges cannot get a definite headcount from this since it is not binding. It is just a feel good for the few who are accepted and misery for all of those who have a loved or liked one left hanging. The holiday season that should be a time of enjoyment and peace is now filled with application completion under a pall that is like that of a wake. There is no joy and hope as there was when that Early app was completed. And then for some kids there is the spectre of final exams hanging over their heads that they should be studying for. I do not think there should be early apps, though I am and have been a great beneficiary of the policy. It hurts me to see the stress and tensions that this system causes. Again, it is a matter of numbers, hurtful to more kids and families, than helpful. I also think it strikes terror in the hearts of many who are applying RD as they see the ED spots fill up. It does diminish the chances of those who do not apply RD just by the nature of the system.</p>

<p>what can i say… i only applied ea because people bullied me into it. i could have made my app so much better if i had put a little more time into it. It wasnt worthwhile</p>