<p>Yep, it was exhibit.
And the slope was 1</p>
<p>i think the function of last paragraph is the shift of discussion. cuz previous paragraphs talk about the reasons why the author do not think college athletes should be paid. then the last paragraph is about the criticism of college putting too much emphasis on sports for those guys rather than academic study</p>
<p>So guys, to confirm, “had begun” question is experimental? </p>
<p>More importantly, is “had begun” a identifying error or sentence improvement?</p>
<p>what was the answer finally in writing identifying after recording it since 50 years or so is that recording it mistake?</p>
<p>In exhibit vs. spectacle, I’d go with spectacle. The author was trying to emphasize how ridiculous it was to make a huge deal out of college sports games which fits to cynical, an earlier answer. And exhibit is rather something I’d use for paintings or museums than for a football game.</p>
<p>After recording was a mistake. The way the sentence was it meant that the X’ album had recorded itself.</p>
<p>@ DUffman1991 can u write everything each SC and each passage u remembeer cause i trust u and i cant sum my answers need 1 brief explanation of answers</p>
<p>I thought that wa a mistake, if you reanrrage the sentence it sound weird… because “it” refer to nothing…
i think it should be changed to"after being recored, the cd…" or something like that</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Had begun was identifying error</p></li>
<li><p>Recording it was an error (I hope so)</p></li>
<li><p>Exhibit vs spectacle, I went for exhibit, but spectacle can be correct too… I mean exhibit and spectacle are really similar words.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>agree with zhshzh44 cuz the major point of the last paragraph is not about conceding a point but about shift the focus of the discussion</p>
<p>btw do u remember reluctant going i put the error there and also in adhering by the rules or smth</p>
<p>I prefer spectacle because exibit feel like a something more formal</p>
<p>“spectacle” I’m sure is right </p>
<p>“shifting terms of discussion” is the only one that made sense</p>
<p>“recording it” was the error </p>
<p>“reluctant going” was the error</p>
<p>Anyone remember an error which was “marvel” for writing?</p>
<p>All the question that I got wrong in CR was vocab-related…
what’s the answer for the judge in supreme court one? nothing sound right… I chose exacting …demanding</p>
<p>“reluctant going” should be “reluctant to go”, pretty sure</p>
<p>@Critmaster: It was an error. Should have been ‘adhering to’.</p>
<p>1.the error of “marvel” it should be marveled as the beginning of the sentence goes like X and Y spent hours driving Blalala, therefore, it should be past tense</p>
<p>2.the supreme court in SC, I chose exacting & demanding ( not sure)</p>
<p>@ 11041994 ye i got them. btw all i remember on chinese girlpassage Satisfaction and nonchalance after husbands words anybody got it?</p>
<p>for the fairness one…i put something like no one should get a smaller share…because it’s not about judging someone .it’s about all labors should be paid…</p>
<p>nonchalance is wrong, the word should be positive… i dont rmb what i chose, anyone got the rest of choices?</p>