<ol>
<li><p>The text about the emerging Chinese artist and her reference to the French artist - the sentence went something like this: “the deft assurance with which his meaty hands captured the delicate/frail flowers”. Hands are inanimate objects, and here they are said to be ‘capturing’ flowers. Looks like personification right?</p></li>
<li><p>How would the painter (Yuliang?) respond to her husband’s appreciation in the last line? I put “surprise and pleasure”; that right? Here’s the passage (somebody posted it earlier): [Page</a> Title](<a href=“http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:mDlM7WY9TdMJ:zoolander52.tripod.com/theartsection2.6/id1.html+french+artist+lulled+by+meaty+hand&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us]Page”>http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:mDlM7WY9TdMJ:zoolander52.tripod.com/theartsection2.6/id1.html+french+artist+lulled+by+meaty+hand&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us). Here’s what followed the last sentence, clearly showing that Yuliang was ‘elated’ i.e. ‘surprise and pleasure’:</p></li>
</ol>
<p>He doesnt answer. Oddly anxious, Yuliang chews a cuticle. When it stings, she looks down to see that shes bitten too hard again: blood wells. </p>
<p>This is how you spend your days now? he says. </p>
<p>I mostly do them after I study. </p>
<p>Have you had lessons? </p>
<p>She laughs. When would I have had lessons? Then, realizing he means at the Hall, she bites her lip. No. Never. II just like to try to draw things sometimes. Im no good at all. </p>
<p>He purses his lips. Actually, you are. Youre very good. </p>
<p>The compliment all but takes her breath away. Im no Shi Tao, she manages finally. You can surely see that– </p>
<p>Its interesting, he goes on, ignoring the comment.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>I wrote my test in India, and I didn’t have the section including the ‘Audrey Hepburn’ question, or the ‘Gored himself’ question. So is that the experimental section? Does anyone remember the answer to the ‘Dictator felt more and more isolated and no more trusted even his closest associates, resulting in a final lapse of ___" question?</p></li>
<li><p>In the Blues passage, between the two brothers, one of them ‘pounded at the keys in anger(?)’, and the other ‘painfully struggled for mastery’ or something like that. I remember both descriptions having negative connotations, and so I put ‘both indicate their reluctance to learning the piano’ one (the sentence didn’t go like that, but it meant the same). Remember also that ‘like my brothers, my mother had forced me to learn the piano’ … meaning the brothers were also ‘forced’.</p></li>
<li><p>‘Fairness’ in the college athletics passage - clearly it did not refer to ‘everyone gets paid equally’ because the coach, trainer, dean and athletes get paid differently because they all do different jobs with varying degrees of importance. However, ‘all being governed by the same principles’ makes sense, because the coach gets paid for his work, and similarly the athletes should get paid for their work. Right?</p></li>
<li><p>In the college athletics passage 2 - the last paragraph serves to ‘shift the terms of the discussion’ because up until then the author was criticising and being sarcastic about the suggestion to pay athletes. In that paragraph, however, he shifts the discussion to discuss the broader issue of how American people and corporations are ignoring education in favour of sports, and how American education is degrading. He stopped criticising the idea of paying, and was talking of larger concerns.</p></li>
<li><p>“That the pharmaceutical company would benefit from the research was not even hinted in the paper.” I found nothing wrong in the original sentence. Can anybody confirm ‘E’ as the correct answer?</p></li>
<li><p>“Kennedy had began the space program” … clearly ‘had began’ is wrong, because the past participle for ‘begin’ is ‘begun’. Thus it should’ve been “Kennedy had begun the space program”. This wasn’t in the experimental (Pyramids) section.</p></li>
<li><p>Again, in the college athletics question, it should’ve been ‘spectacle’, not ‘exhibit’. Someone said the author viewed the matches in a negative view, which I don’t concur with. It was a show, a grand spectacle, a big celebration which drew a large crowd.</p></li>
<li><p>In the bats question, the metaphor served to show the similarities in human and bat perception (or bats’ senses are closer to ours than we expect), because the author argues that just as we see different wavelengths of light as ‘red’ or ‘blue’, the bats might see different ultrasound signals (or male textures or whatever) as ‘red’ or ‘blue’. The signal is different, but the actual perception by the bat’s brain of the signal might be just like ours.</p></li>
<li><p>What is this discussion about the November 2005 and November 2010 papers? Were questions repeated?</p></li>
<li><p>ColdFlame got hold of the bats passage here: <a href=“http://casweb.nist.ac.th/TOK/TOKWEB2004/TOKWEBFILES/Ways%20of%20Knowing%20PAGE/CORE%20READINGS/Bats%20Sight%20and%20Sound.pdf[/url]”>http://casweb.nist.ac.th/TOK/TOKWEB2004/TOKWEBFILES/Ways%20of%20Knowing%20PAGE/CORE%20READINGS/Bats%20Sight%20and%20Sound.pdf</a></p></li>
</ol>