<p>@ Maxyend are you sure about remedy?
@ jianghuchuan1412 dont remember tbh</p>
<p>Ok so what is the question and the other answers for the one with monetary…feasible; languorous; incongruous; renegade?</p>
<p>for renegade,someone was allied with nonconformist so he was deemed as renegade.
for incongrous,someone so shrewd he could simmilar incongruities.
for langorous,someone was listless.</p>
<p>@critmaster, very. Look back about 10-20 pages to see my discussion with miasanmia about that question.</p>
<p>can you recall the rest of the answers?</p>
<p>Um,I chose mode.</p>
<p>BTW anyone rmb the question for the answer amateurism?</p>
<p>@ hanyuyu95
i chose state rather than mode</p>
<p>the answer for amateurism is to illustrate a point about amateurism</p>
<p>thx! is the question sth about the NBA team?</p>
<p>@zhshzh44
is the amateurism B in that question?</p>
<p>@409391074
i don’t remember exactly，but mayb A
@hanyuyu
that’s the dream team</p>
<p>I now have five uncertain questions …many controversial …
1(in bat) exaggerate the difference or too artificial ?(it asked why going into a cave and acting like a bat is misleading)
2overblown or reliable
3(in guitar boy)the attitude of the eight-grade teacher…was it supportive?
4(in guitar boy) about his brothers / enforcing different approaches or ?<br>
5(in athlete) shift terms or reiterate point?
thx !</p>
<p>1 exaggerate the dfs
2 reliable(guess I am wrong…)
3 supportive
4 df approaches
5 shift terms</p>
<p>2 doubts help please!</p>
<p>1) Was it exaggerate the differences or artificial replica? I’m 90 percent sure it’s the latter, but just need some confirmation.
2) Codified Rules or Fundamental Laws? Unlike most people here, I think it’s the former mainly because fundamental laws was too literal a meaning for ‘principles’ and SAT passages hardly ever have such straightforward in-passage vocab answers. Still, though. I’m unsure about this.</p>
<ol>
<li>I think it was exaggerate the differences.</li>
<li>Overblown</li>
<li>yes</li>
<li>different approaches</li>
<li>shift terms of discussion</li>
</ol>
<p>@User22</p>
<p>1) Exaggerate, I think.
2) Fundamental laws, 100%</p>
<p>It was the principals of vision. Vision doesn’t have “codified rules”, it has fundamental laws (physics and stuff).</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure it was “artificial experience”</p>
<p>^Yeah, I’m note sure what the question was anymore.</p>
<p>“There is a well-known paper by the philosopher Thomas Nagel
called ‘What is it like to be a bat?’. The paper is not so much about bats
as about the philosophical problem of imagining what it is ‘like’ to be
anything that we are not. The reason a bat is a particularly telling
example for a philosopher, however, is that the experiences of an
echolocating bat are assumed to be peculiarly alien and different from
our own. If you want to share a bat’s experience, it is almost certainly
grossly misleading to go into a cave, shout or bang two spoons
together, consciously time the delay before you hear the echo, and
calculate from this how far the wall must be”</p>
<p>It asked what does this part do: </p>
<p>“If you want to share a bat’s experience, it is almost certainly
grossly misleading to go into a cave, shout or bang two spoons
together, consciously time the delay before you hear the echo, and
calculate from this how far the wall must be”</p>
<p>“grossly misleading” suggests its an artificial experience</p>
<p>Okay thanks, I agree with you on the fundamental laws. However, the other question was
''Why is going to a bat and acting like a bat is misleading? ‘’ I remember clearly that the answer had artificial, I just can’t make sense of how ‘exaggerating the differences’ fits in here.</p>
<p>Sent from my GT-I9000 using CC</p>
<p>Thank you coldflame!</p>
<p>Sent from my GT-I9000 using CC</p>
<p>the answer was probably “mold” rather than “state”
the passage was talking about a form for which the brain can interpret stuff
state seems awkward, since it means condition or structure?
whereas mold means shape/form</p>