Is adopting a baby really 'different'?

<p>*The families I’ve seen who have struggled with adoption are ones where there’s a big mismatch between parent(s) and child in terms of energy-really active, extroverted kids in quiet, reserved families, or the opposite-sporty, gregarious parents whose quieter, more cerebral kids don’t feel they fit in. *</p>

<p>Dan Savage wrote a book about adopting a child who has personality traits very different from his parents.
Actually the book is more about the process of open adoption, but he has written columns about raising a child who has interests they know little about.
[Dan</a> Savage Says Son ‘Came Out’ To Him As Straight (VIDEO)](<a href=“HuffPost - Breaking News, U.S. and World News | HuffPost”>Dan Savage Says Son 'Came Out' To Him As Straight (VIDEO) | HuffPost Voices)</p>

<p>I’m glad to see some other people add some more nuanced views to this thread.</p>

<p>I’m a bio kid with adopted and bio sibs. I think it’s a lot harder to raise adopted kids when you also have bio kids and especially hard to do it when you have bio kids who are younger than the adopted kid. </p>

<p>Now, I know some of you have done this and apparently done it successfully. From the outside looking in, I think people would think we had a very successful family too. I think even the parents of a family with both bio and adopted kids are sometimes unaware of the issues between the kids. </p>

<p>Fertility problems run in my family and as a result there are LOTS of adopted kids in my extended family. Based on this family, the situations with both types of kids in the family are less successful than those in which all the kids were adopted. I think it’s especially hard when the bio kids are younger…and this is intensified when people adopt kids because they don’t seem able to have them and then, years later, unexpectedly have bio kids. The kind of jealousy some kids experience when mommy has a new baby when a kid is 5 or 6 may be intensified when the new kid is bio and the older kid is adopted. </p>

<p>I don’t think these situations are necessarily fraught with problems. Indeed, in 3 families I know–2 in my family and one a former work colleague–there are 4 kids, 2 bio and 2 adopted. One of the adopted kids in each is fine and the other has real issues. My former colleague’s oldest kid is adopted. She’s great–in her early 30s now, has a Ph.D and is married. I think her parents really thought they had figured out how to do this perfectly. Second kid is also adopted—and has been in intensive therapy for many years with limited success. The older adopted girl has really tried to help this sib–again with little success. </p>

<p>In another family the oldest kid is bio, the middle 2 are adopted and the youngest is bio. One of the adopted kids is fine. The other, now middle-aged, has had major substance abuse problems. The therapists–and there have been many over the years–say he really needs to know who his bio parents are and that’s the only thing that could help. (He stayed sober for more than 10 years until something triggered his “Who am I really?” issue again. And don’t criticize me for the language–it’s his. )</p>

<p>Another family adopted a child at birth and then adopted two older sisters from foster care. Older former foster kid told younger sis we are “real” family and the other kid isn’t “really” our family over and over again. That was hurtful to the other kid.</p>

<p>I also know two people who gave up kids for adoption and had those kids find them years later. I know a lot about a third such situation. There can be issues in those situations later too. In two of those situations, the adopted kids really prefer their bio parents–and that has been very hurtful to the adoptive parents. In one of those cases, the adopted kid’s bio parents married after his birth and never had any other kids. He is now in business with his bio dad and incredibly close to his bio parents. He has very little contact with his adoptive parents. </p>

<p>I do think things are better today with more open adoptions and with more medical info being given to adoptive parents. (Every time my adopted sib got sick the doctors did every test known to mankind because they didn’t have a family medical history.) </p>

<p>I think adoption is a wonderful thing and it usually works well. But there are issues that are unique to families formed by adoption.</p>

<p>All I know is that EVERY baby I have ever cuddled, waved to at the store, or otherwise made contact with, I have fallen in love with. If I could have had a house filled with children I would have, and it wouldn’t have mattered a speck where they came from! </p>

<p>(I’m easy, what can I say?)</p>

<p>justamom,</p>

<p>I don’t know if your post is in response to mine. I think it may help me clarify one point I’m trying to make. I do NOT think that adoption is all about the attitude of the adoptive parents. The child’s inherent nature, feelings about it and experiences with other people also affect the outcome. These are not within the adoptive parents’ control. Kids aren’t chemistry sets when, if you do all the right steps, you can replicate the results. </p>

<p>Some adopted kids have a strong need to find their bio parents, for example. That may have absolutely nothing to do with anything their adoptive parents have done. As I said before, I know families in which one adopted kid really, really felt there was a hole in their heart or psyche because they didn’t know anything about their bio parents and another kid in the SAME family did not share that attitude at all.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>It’s one thing to love a baby, even a baby that cries 10 hours a day. But once they start walking and talking, it’s not necessarily so easy.</p>

<p>^^But, in many cases, the parents can control what comes next, how they respond. If I caught ANY kid I had some relationship with (mine, friend’s, my kids’ friends, etc) in the borderline (is it borderline?) abuse of telling another sib he/she was lesser, I’d have something to say. Not saying I would rebuke, but say something, at least reframe it.</p>

<p>My kids’ bio families found them. Not unexpected. D1 ignored the text. D2 had a few conversations then dropped it. They recognize their bio sister around town. This is one fact of their lives we learned to accept and work with. Anticipate. Not fear.</p>

<p>

Excellent post, Jonri. I am so glad this never happened in my family. It would have destroyed me (and I told my adoptive mom this, once.) I resented the heck out of my younger adoptive brother and I hated everything about being the oldest. I can’t imagine how I would have reconciled myself to my parents’ having a bio child, being that in my experience, society in general is so much more biased toward bio children.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>If I gave you any reason to think my relative–the mom in this situation–failed to do this, let me assure you that she and her H did…over and over and over…</p>

<p>jonri - No, I wasn’t responding to your post, in fact I never even read the thread, only the OP’s original. :)</p>

<p>Quite an interesting thread. My knee jerk reaction was “of course there is no difference between adopted and bio kids! What a question.” </p>

<p>Of special interest was the conversation about fit between parent and child personalities. We know of a family with two adopted kids. Parents are older, introverted, cerebral. One child is quiet and bookish, a great fit. The other is not. When the more active one was young, they were fascinated by how different he was in energy and interests. As he got older, struggled in school, was still very very active, they were less fascinated and more concerned. I really felt for both sides, the parents who were baffled by the kid and the kid who was so misunderstood by his parents. </p>

<p>These fit issues happen in bio and adoptive families. I remember reading a vignette in a Brazelton baby book years and years ago about just this issue, and how bio parents have to put away their expectations and accept the kids they get. I can see how a fit problem in an adoptive family would be more fraught.</p>