Is an M.D. worth it for the sake of research?

<p>Hey guys, I am highly interested in science, specifically, biology, physics, chemistry, and neuroscience. Is it wrong to go to med school if one is more curious and interested in the science, rather than actual patient care? I’m not trying to come off as a House wannabe, but I sincerely love science, and don’t truly care much for people themselves; this is not to say that I cannot remain objective when caring for a patient, or be empathetic, which I certainly can. Some of my character traits are: introverted, dedicated, ambitious, bull-like persistence when it comes to puzzles or problems in general, very logical & analytical, pensive, friendly( although not one for small chat), enjoy structure, generally pretty lazy about uninteresting things, and that’s about all I could think of off the top of my head.</p>

<p>If you have no interest in actual patient care, medical school is not the path you should be looking at. Even MD/PhDs have patient care responsibilities. Med school is only 2 years of basic science; the last 2 years are hands on patient care and management. Residency (another 3-7 years) is more training in patient care and management.</p>

<p>If your primary interest is in science, you would likely be happier and more fulfilled in your career by pursuing an advanced science degree like a PhD.</p>

<p>bumpp</p>