<p>as advantageous as being a Native American? Like is it on that same level?</p>
<p>I believe that counts as being a pacific islander.</p>
<p>I know, but is Pacific Islander status as helpful as Native American status?</p>
<p>Jaddua, for all I know Pacific Islander is counted in the same category as Asian. However, certainly you can take advantage of a rather unique heritage in your essays by highlighting anything that would make you stand out from other applicants. Furthermore, Native American status in admissions requires a tribal affiliation or tribal ID (CCers, correct me if I am wrong on this)</p>
<p>I’m actually Native American (heck yes, Tribal ID too, from a smallish tribe), I just asked this because I’m curious.</p>
<p>For medical school yes, so I would assume the same for college admission.
AMCAS profile (you can log on to AMCAS and see for yourself if you like):
</p>
<p>Haha alright, that’s awesome! Best of luck to you in your college process.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>This 10 character limit is stifling</p>
<p>On forms I’ve usually seen Native American and Alaska Native listed together. Native Hawaiian is listed with Pacific Islander (which includes US possessions such as Guam). Either status will be beneficial to you, especially the Tribal ID if you are near an Indian Reservation (the latter does not have to do with admissions). I think the only place where Native Hawaiians would be common would be in Hawaii. Regardless, your status makes it easier to qualify for some federal programs during college.</p>
<p>I don’t know about how equal the advantages are, but if they aren’t, they should be, seeing as how Native Americans and Native Hawaiians have similar histories/issues.
Though many of my classmates are frustrated when ‘Asian/Pacific Islander’ are grouped together on exams and such.</p>
<p>I definitely won’t complain if it’s helpful, though. And, honestly, I’ve been wondering how much of a difference it would make.</p>