<p>I’ve skimmed this thread but haven’t seen the insurance implications discussed. Check with your own insurer, as I suppose YMMV but the following has been true on all policies I have heard of: If the kid has his own car, the insurance cost is dramatically higher than if he is an authorized driver on a family car. Now, adding a teen is going to up your insurance substantially anyway. But you need to add into the money equation the insurance cost difference between a kid driving your car and a kid driving his own car. Corollary: the insurance company’s definition of whether the kid has his “own” car has nothing to do with who is on the title; it’s a matter of how many cars and how many drivers in the household.</p>
<p>In our family, we already owned 3 cars before DS turned 16, as DH had a little convertible sports car along with our two regular cars (see related thread I might start entitled Is it spoiling a 50-something husband to allow him to buy a little convertible sports car? ;)). So, even though no additional car was added to our fleet when DS got his license, insurance company saw him as having his own car. In our particular family, we were able to solve this because I’m self employed and could pull one car off the family policy to a commercial policy. Hence, 2 cars/3 drivers - no extra “surcharge” for a teen driving his own car.</p>
<p>Not saying one way or the other whether buying a teen his own car is “spoiling.” Others have covered all those bases, imo, and I agree it’s about the how and why, not the whether. As well as the “what” - brand new BMW, SUV… - spoiling. Utilitiarian older car - not spoiling, in my book.</p>
<p>When DH’s daughter was in her 20’s, he did the “I’ll match what you save” approach, which can be a good one. Kids (well, people) tend to appreciate and care better for things they have a financial stake in.</p>