Is smoking a turnoff for women?

[baller4lyfe]

<p>

I wouldn’t wipe out either.

You wouldn’t wipe out cigs? No one would know it was you; it would just happen if by your snap. That’s odd. Hell, I would even wipe alcohol off the earth, that way so many friendships, abuses, drunk drivers and deaths could be stopped. These drugs are descriptive and destructive. The elimination of these drugs outweigh the costs (the costs would be “drunk fun times”) since hundreds of thousands of innocent lives would be saved. You would save hundreds of thousands of lives if you did. What’s the reason behind your decision? Do you really think people need them to relieve stress or (gasp) to look socially acceptable?</p>

<p>I mean that it is a sole detriment in the sense that it doesn’t serve any other purpose other for which they were originally designed. What you say here shows irrelevant playing in the sense that you’re skirting around the issue:</p>

<p>

One could argue the fast food industry is in fact, using “food” as a pretense for maximizing corporate profit. Is it that hard to believe that McDonalds <em>GASP</em> is, in fact, marketing their products in a similar manner to that of RJ Reynolds?

</p>

<p>LOL. Goodness. Maximizing corporate profit? What the hell does that have to do with your health? </p>

<p>

Lung cancer? And the figures are not in the millions, buddy.</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lcod.htm[/url][/quote]”>Referral Page - FASTSTATS - Leading Causes of Death

</a>
Yes they are, according to Harvard Public Health, buddy.
<a href=“http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/2003-releases/press09122003.html[/url]”>http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/2003-releases/press09122003.html&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
Get your priorities right.</p>