<p>I know ppl have tons of arguments for christianity…and seem to have “historical evidence” for it</p>
<p>why not buddhism? hinduism? Any evidence of those?</p>
<p>what do you mean “arguments for”? Religion, esecially in the context of judeo-christian religion, is a matter of faith in God, not evidence. People have provided evidence for their faith, but if you rely entirely on physical evidence, how can it be faith?</p>
<p>i totally agree with u mediocretes, but some ppl try to dig up evidence for creatoinism-some say it is not just faith</p>
<p>All religion requires faith, and any evidence found as justification requires faith for it to be accepted as evidence. Just think about it - if any undeniable evidence actually existed, there wouldn’t be any religious arguement, and everyone would believe in exactly the same thing…</p>
<p>There is no real evidence to prove or disprove any of this stuff. Which is why I’m agnostic.</p>
<p>what you’re asking about is not historical evidence for a certain religion, but evidence for the existance of god, which does not exist.</p>
<p>“if any undeniable evidence actually existed, there wouldn’t be any religious arguement”</p>
<p>How often do we come across undeniable evidence for any situation? I think people are looking for palatable evidence.</p>