<p>I just took the first practice test in the book, after doing almost all of the ‘‘tips’’. I wound up with a score range of 610-670 (raw score of 39). I think it is a good score; most people think that Chung’s SAT math is a bit harder than regular SAT math.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>Chung is 100 percent irrelevant. </p>
<p>For comparison purposes, your score only means something when compared to his other tests. In other words, it means absolutely nothing in terms of the real SAT.</p>
<p>Now, change directions and practice with official tests. Use Chung only when one of his tips might appear on a real question. There is an outside chance his example or explanation migh be helpful. Remember what they say about hogs and acorns!</p>
<p>I do practice with official tests from the Collegeboard, but isn’t Chung’s good because I want to raise my math score? I recently took an official test, and got a 720/800…so isn’t Chung’s good to help me fill the gap between a 720 and a 800?</p>
<p>Bump…</p>
<p>I don’t think Chungs is a good comparison at all. The content of the book is great, I learned quite a few things from those tips but when you take the tests they are really messed up. I find that most of hard questions are in the middle of the test rather than the end. I can usually answer the last 3-4 questions which are the hardest with ease.Since his questions are a lot harder than the legit SAT I would say you should be able to score in the 700s on the real SAT but this can change depending on how many little mistakes you make. I have the potential to score 750+ every time(I say this because most of the questions I miss are due to silly mistakes not because I do not know how to solve them) but I always make mistakes and end up scoring 680-740.</p>
<p>Oh ok thanks 
Yea, I am aware of the ‘‘not so good comparison’’
but I bought the book because I wanted a challenge
and to see if its really ‘‘hard’’ like people say it is</p>
<p>@xiggi, what do they say about hogs and acorns?</p>
<p>Yes, I was gonna ask that too!</p>