<p>There is an old book written by a Stanford Admissions officer, and lots of quotes from a Stanford admissions officer in a more recent book. The first statement is about correct - they do a first sort to cut down the pile. Based on what I’ve read, the second is not. I’ll let others comment, if they have more insider information.</p>
<p>I don’t know this for a fact, but there is no way that they don’t look at any of the previous stuff AT ALL. Scores are easy to compare, and there are really really similar ECs even at high levels. Essays… that’s just about how admissions feel about you. They have the scores right in front of them, so why not take a peek?</p>
<p>From what I remember from the old Stanford admissions article I read, it went something like: the first round entails sorting applicants into three piles – clear admit pile, non-competitive (i.e. clear rejects) pile, and the “swim” pile (to be evaluated again). After that, they go through the swim pile again and narrow it down till they get the right number of students. I’d think they’d be reviewing the clear admits/swim applicants holistically regardless of the round.</p>
<p>yes, kyledavid’s description is what I too read in the book I got, so I think we can safely say the OP’s counselor is wrong by a big margin. It’s also contrary to logic - no college admits that way, leave alone a top tier college.</p>