Is this really bad?

<p>Okay so I’ve already taken subject tests in chem and bio (800s on both) but I just found out last week that I have to take one more test because they’re both in the same “subject area” (thank you for not telling me this in June, college counselor). So I’m planning on taking math II in October, since I’ve been studying for this on/off since December (tried to take in January and again in June, freaked out and cancelled a few days before the test both times). However, is it bad that I’m not taking a test in humanities? My first choice is the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Cornell (program with strong emphasis on the sciences/little on liberal arts), my second choice is UC - Berkeley’s College of Letters and Sciences (or whatever it’s called) and my third choice is Stanford. I’m planning to major in something involving cell/molecular biology with a possible career in research. I’m not terrible at humanities by any means, I just have no inclination whatsoever to study for a humanities test, especially after my friend showed me the nonsensical lit practice questions, and also since I already have been studying for math in the past and over the summer I feel like it would be a waste and I wouldn’t have enough time between now and October to start studying something else. So, how bad is it that all three of my subject tests are in technical-type subjects?</p>

<p>Also, if anyone has any advice on how not to fail the math II, I would be very happy to hear from you. I’m doing somewhat better on the practice questions this time around (most of the questions I get wrong are because of stupid errors rather than from “WHAT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT?!”) but I’m still really worried about the actual test. How much harder/easier is the real test compared to the Princeton Review book?</p>

<p>Unless the colleges require 3 SAT’s you won’t need to take M IIC.
But, some colleges require you to take Math IIC</p>