That definitely does not sound like what I would call tiger parenting. If anything, it might be heading toward helicopter parenting, but maybe not that either.
I was just reminded there is another term I like which got coined by Neil Howe for a typical Gen X parenting style the NiceUnparticulars arguably do in fact practice, “stealth fighter parenting.” This was a play on helicopter parenting–see for example here:
Here is the core definition:
Stealth-fighter parents do not hover. They choose when and where they will attack. If the issue seems below their threshold of importance, they save their energy and let it go entirely. But if it crosses their threshold and shows up on their radar, they will strike — rapidly, in force and often with no warning. When these Gen-X “security moms” and “committed dads” are fully roused, they can be even more attached, protective and interventionist than Boomers ever were.
And probably “hawk” parents would be just as good of a metaphor–not hovering like a helicopter, but circling around higher up, monitoring, prepared to dive in at 200 mph as necessary.
Personally, this may be my Gen X speaking, but I don’t really see this as inherently problematic. But as with most things, it could be a problem if taken to excess. Indeed, that article is written for school administrators, and it is certainly not presenting this as all good. Then again, when it gets to what schools should be doing to deal with Gen X parents–that mostly sounds good to me!
Anyway, point being I don’t think what you are describing, particularly as applied to mental health, is a bad form of parenting. But I do think all of us stealth fighter/hawk parents need to be really thoughtful and deliberate about when we go into protective mode.