<p>So, the question is, if the technology really existed to genuinely tell what someone was thinking, would adcoms be justified in making decisions based on them? For example, if they could tell who the real “community service” types were, instead of taking all those 500 hours of volunteering at face value? Or, if they could identify that Harvard reject who’s only going to transfer after first semester? Or, the person who should be put on suicide watch? Discuss:</p>
<p>[Scientists</a> Can Now Officially Read Your Mind, UCLA Declares - Los Angeles News - The Informer](<a href=“http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2011/12/mind_reading_brain_scan_mri_ucla_cravings.php]Scientists”>http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2011/12/mind_reading_brain_scan_mri_ucla_cravings.php)</p>