<p>It should be a>1 :)</p>
<p>i said a was more than 1</p>
<p>what was the purpose of the parenthetical comment in the group passage, acknowledge discomfort or show some are averse to self reflection</p>
<p>The sentence completion with someone shutting the book and how it was abominable. I narrowed it down to labyrinthine and execrable.</p>
<p>It was execrable, search it up if your not sure.</p>
<p>@infrap0ds I didn’t get that question.
And yay! I put execrable!</p>
<p>i said execrable</p>
<p>What did “wanting” mean in the Cold War passage?</p>
<p>i put 0<a<1 why="" is="" it="" a="">1?</a<1></p>
<p>What was the primary concern of the Japanese rice passage? discussing food and culture or highlighting a pivotal moment in a family’s history?</p>
<p>Discussing food and culture
And a>1 because the parabola is steeper than an a=1 parabola
I put lacking for wanting, but I’m not sure…</p>
<p>i put discussing food and culture.</p>
<p>the correct answer was the one linking culture and food.</p>
<p>and put that wanting=desiring</p>
<p>I put audacious for the sentence completion… crap! I also got the parabola one wrong - I said a had to be a fraction but I had those properties mixed up. Oh well…</p>
<p>In the Cold War passage, wanting meant “desire”.</p>
<p>Wanting, in that context, should mean lacking.</p>
<p>uh oh. for wanting i put lacking…blah</p>
<p>I put wanting = lacking. I’m pretty sure that’s what it was.</p>
<p>i put lacking too. the cold war **** me up since i was feeling like **** at that time…</p>
<p>I was deciding between lacking and desiring, but I chose lacking because the next part of the sentence said something about there was no reason for the Cold War.</p>
<p>i was gonna put desire, but then lacking seemed better because desire would mean that the Soviet Union desired to expand, but it didn’t. it just wanted to fix its problems.</p>