Yes.
2 Likes
It came from yesterdayās data dump, but whether it is real-real is TBD. The FBI had asked for a handwriting analysis, but the results arenāt there.
2 Likes
And Iām wondering ā¦.since it was sent from prison ā would there have been a review of the contents by prison authorities before it was mailed?
1 Like
I think it was Mr Epsteinās desire to inflict pain on the person whose DOJ put him in jail.
I wouldnāt put much credence into the letter. Which 100% would have been screened by the correction facility. On both ends
2 Likes
And once screened, it would have been allowed to pass through.
1 Like
At least itās a useful reminder that pedophilia and sexual crimes against children take place in all kinds of ālegitimateā circles, everywhere from organized sport to organized religion to high-level politics and finance 
6 Likes
And inspected by the receiving prison, maybe held for months or bouncing around the prison mail for months.
I was thinking in terms of censorship, etc
6 Likes
yes, on both ends
i heard Nina Totenburg speak once about John Hinckly Jr and one of his hearings for release. A psychologist was testifying that John and Ted were corresponding and discussing this and that. Ted? Why yes, Ted Bundy. The psychologist said it was not unusual for famous people in prisons to correspond. i guess the judge, who had been leaning back in his chair, jolted forward and shouted āBench!ā and a few minutes later denied the motion for parole or release or whatever. Even though it may be common for famous prisoners to write to each other, the judge found that concerning.
But that doesnāt mean the mail is freely delivered without inspection. Iām sure if he wrote and mailed the letter just before his death, the line about ātaking the short routeā would have been flagged. I donāt think mail found in his cell, ready to be mailed, would have been mail after his death (to get the cancellations on the envelope/postcard.
Was the letter released by the Justice Dept? Or was that fake too? Apologies for posting false information, I do try not to do that!
I canāt read the Twitter post because I deleted the X/Twitter app, so wasnāt able to read the details.
ETA reputable new outlets are reporting that Epstein did write a letter to Nasser, although the contents of that letter are not known.
1 Like
Regardless of the veracity, Iām quite sure the orange guy contacted Pam to put out that statement
7 Likes
So, the Justice Dept. Has announced that the FBI has determined that this document is a fake?
As Church Lady would say, āHow CONVENIENT.ā
Iām not buying it.
6 Likes
Thatās the problem. We donāt know what it real and what is fake. And thereās no trust in the people releasing these documents
Iāve heard that the redacted items are easily seen because of the way they were redacted, I guess people are claiming you can copy and paste the redacted documents into adobe and see what was redacted.
What a mess
5 Likes
A fake planted to perhaps serve as a foil ā¦ just because itās in the files doesnāt mean itās true. Casting doubt on purpose.
9 Likes
I could read the first portion of an Atlantic article which says there are some fake pictures of Epstein with a child or teen photoshopped in (because there are real pictures of him with known people). iām not sure where they came from, but 3000 pictures and notes and documents were released so iām sure some are fake.
Was there any reporting regarding how fake items got into the released information?
3 Likes
i donāt have a subscription so only got to read the first few paragraphs. I think the FBI collected everything from his homes, the jails, things sent to him, etc. Celebrity prisoners get a lot of mail.
Maybe it was stuff printed off his computer?
1 Like
ugh. There is a way to redact with adobe that is permanent but you have to know how to do it. They should have.
3 Likes
The DOJ sometimes receives fake items. According to the law that was passed, they must release everything they have ā and that includes some fake items. Weāre getting a dump, not a curation.
1 Like