<p>Gee, thanks for giving us the latest “news”, direct from The National Enquirer. </p>
<p>Even if anything in that article had merit, and one were to believe it, why would Mr. Young, who is married, state he was the father of Ms. Hunter’s baby, just to protect John Edwards? I mean that would be a MAJOR sacrifice in terms of wrecking his own marriage for an affair he did not have. That alone makes no sense.</p>
<p>Also, the article states that Ms. Hunter denies that Edwards is the father. The entire article is based on an unnamed “confidante” of Ms. Hunter!</p>
<p>By the way, your subject heading for the thread: “John Edwards Has a Love Child” is a further opportunity for propaganda as it is stated as fact, rather than “the latest from The National Enquirer.” Hmmmmm.</p>
<p>Allright, Obama is a Muslim radical, Hillary is gay, Edwards sleeps around, Kucinich is a Martian, and the National Enquirer is the one and only trusted source of news!</p>
<p>It is still up on the Drudgereport.com. I wasn’t gloating when I posted this link. But does this mean I can gloat now that you were wrong?</p>
<p>BTW, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth were right. Very few of their allegations against Kerry were disproven. Only in the left wing media and blogs, have people chosen to disregard the truth and have developed the phrase “swiftboating”. </p>
<p>If the allegations against Edwards are untrue, who is behind it? Hillary? Obama? Who is the source who seems to know everyting?</p>
<p>This is just a bizarre story. Mr Young (the former director of operations for the Edwards campaign), the alleged father, has moved her down the street from him, in a gated community not far from his family home/wife and family? And bought her a BMW? It is reported that on 12/12 when a reporter knocked on his door, he answered and claimed he was not Andrew Young, but the reporter heard his wife call out “Andrew?”</p>
<p>When the baby is born in three months, we will have to see what he or she looks like. If the baby has great hair, then we will know Edwards is the daddy.</p>
<p>So what? It will not remain a mystery forever. DNA is conclusive. Either he is the father or he is being smeared and should sue. Is that more clear?</p>
<p>The sure way we’ll know the baby is Edward’s is when Ms. Hunter goes into labor. If the baby jumps out of the ambulance to chase it all the way to the hospital in order to sue the obstetrician, we have proof it’s his.</p>