John Edwards Has A Love Child

<p>

</p>

<p>[UPDATE:</a> NATIONAL ENQUIRER WORLD EXCLUSIVE: <b>JOHN EDWARDS</b> LOVE CHILD SCANDAL! - Celebrity News | Gossip - National Enquirer](<a href=“http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_love_child/celebrity/64426]UPDATE:”>http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_love_child/celebrity/64426)</p>

<p>How will this affect it Edward’s campaign?</p>

<p>Of course, this information is coming from a magazine that quotes aliens (and I don’t mean the ones from Mexico).</p>

<p>Gee, thanks for giving us the latest “news”, direct from The National Enquirer. </p>

<p>Even if anything in that article had merit, and one were to believe it, why would Mr. Young, who is married, state he was the father of Ms. Hunter’s baby, just to protect John Edwards? I mean that would be a MAJOR sacrifice in terms of wrecking his own marriage for an affair he did not have. That alone makes no sense.</p>

<p>Also, the article states that Ms. Hunter denies that Edwards is the father. The entire article is based on an unnamed “confidante” of Ms. Hunter!</p>

<p>By the way, your subject heading for the thread: “John Edwards Has a Love Child” is a further opportunity for propaganda as it is stated as fact, rather than “the latest from The National Enquirer.” Hmmmmm.</p>

<p>Allright, Obama is a Muslim radical, Hillary is gay, Edwards sleeps around, Kucinich is a Martian, and the National Enquirer is the one and only trusted source of news!</p>

<p>razorsharp: Before you gloat too much, even the Drudge Report has taken down the story.</p>

<p>Nice swift boating.</p>

<p>I see it on the DRUGE report now…</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>It is still up on the Drudgereport.com. I wasn’t gloating when I posted this link. But does this mean I can gloat now that you were wrong?</p>

<p>BTW, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth were right. Very few of their allegations against Kerry were disproven. Only in the left wing media and blogs, have people chosen to disregard the truth and have developed the phrase “swiftboating”. </p>

<p>If the allegations against Edwards are untrue, who is behind it? Hillary? Obama? Who is the source who seems to know everyting?</p>

<p>“If the allegations against Edwards are untrue, who is behind it? Hillary? Obama? Who is the source who seems to know everyting?”</p>

<p>Not Hillary. She needs Edwards to do well in Iowa. I have no idea what to make of this since another man is claiming paternity.</p>

<p>(Just a side note: there was a great deal of denial over Drudge’s report of the infamous blue dress until DNA proved its veracity.)</p>

<p>This is just a bizarre story. Mr Young (the former director of operations for the Edwards campaign), the alleged father, has moved her down the street from him, in a gated community not far from his family home/wife and family? And bought her a BMW? It is reported that on 12/12 when a reporter knocked on his door, he answered and claimed he was not Andrew Young, but the reporter heard his wife call out “Andrew?”</p>

<p>This will be interesting.</p>

<p>Again, slowly for those slow on the uptake… who cares? </p>

<p>What does it have to do with foriegn policy, taxes, jobs, the war, the infrastructure? </p>

<p>I’m not in junior high anymore. I don’t care where who sticks what where… as that has so little to do with running our country.</p>

<p>I thought Edwards was Jamie Lynn Spears’ baby daddy - shucks.</p>

<p>so now are we supposed to forget lusty Rudy with juicy Judy and their tax payer funded XXX affair?</p>

<p>BunsenBurner has it right.</p>

<p>

Nah - that’s Fred Thompson.</p>

<p>Oh Chedva, I threw up a little in my mouth when I read that. EWWW!</p>

<p>When the baby is born in three months, we will have to see what he or she looks like. If the baby has great hair, then we will know Edwards is the daddy.</p>

<p>“(Just a side note: there was a great deal of denial over Drudge’s report of the infamous blue dress until DNA proved its veracity.)”</p>

<p>so what ???</p>

<p>Guess it’s a slow news day.</p>

<p>“so what ???”</p>

<p>So what? It will not remain a mystery forever. DNA is conclusive. Either he is the father or he is being smeared and should sue. Is that more clear?</p>

<p>One of the owners of the National Enquirer is Roger Altman.</p>

<p>The sure way we’ll know the baby is Edward’s is when Ms. Hunter goes into labor. If the baby jumps out of the ambulance to chase it all the way to the hospital in order to sue the obstetrician, we have proof it’s his.</p>