<p>With the exception of those that are deliciously controversial (I’m talking to you, enigmatic and puzzlement), let’s see if we can compile a list of all the CR answers.</p>
<p>Alternative Medicine:
1.) Passage 1 describes a phenomenon and Passage provides a specific example
2.) Passage 1 was more critical, Passage 2 more enthusiastic
3.) Proponents of the first would support the practioners</p>
<p>Queenmother:
1.) Told why the issue couldn’t be resolved
2.) Conclusions were speculative</p>
<p>Gneiss:
1.) The rock made him feel relatively young
2.) He uses an analogy to explain a difficult concept</p>
<p>Ballet
1.) Steps = movement
2.) A digression…paradox
3.) Fully present = engagement
4.) The studio was unlike her neighborhood
5.) A list of rules and regulations
6.) The curtsy showed respect for authority
7.) Some rules at home didn’t make sense
8.) Difference between individual achievement and an art form</p>
<p>Wolves:
1.) Gently mocking attitude
2.) Coyotes returned to underdog status</p>
<p>Vandalism is Peace:
1.) Graffiti artists co-opted by professional artists
2.) Anxious = uneasy
3.) Notes on the fridge = absurd narrative
4.) The peasants were self-deprecating humor to criticize a position
5.) He mentions the Ronin statue to establish a parallel between him and the youth
6.) The lost art of using the home to convey ideas</p>
<p>Chinese Father
1.) Dictionary = author’s lack of understanding of Chinese
2.) Painstaking = Arduous
3.) Swatch = ignorance</p>
<ol>
<li>Passage 1 more critical while passage 2 more enthusiastic</li>
<li>Second passage was a specific example of something that the first passage discussed in general terms</li>
</ol>
<p>I think that salutary was an answer to an experimental section (had passages about memory, was actually REALLY interesting). Ebullient was an incorrect choice for the “nuanced” question.</p>
<p>bright eyes - same here. Anybody remember the sentence? Also, what was the answer to last question of the Chinese passage? The one where the author mentioned the physicist. Was it an analogy or an explanation of a concern?</p>