<p>do all of our sat 2 schores get sent to colleges, or do we get to pick and choose which ones we send?</p>
<p>You can use score choice an pick which ones. Unless the colleges wants you to send all of them</p>
<p>I really don’t remember the question that samriddhishree is talking about-- which probably means it was relatively straightforward. And if you go to the CollegeBoard’s website (collegeboard.com) you can look up every college’s score choice policy.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>The question asked how many moles of ions are released, period. So it would be 5.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>At higher altitudes the boiling pt is lower (True)
because
At higher altitudes the atmospheric pressure is greater (False)</p>
<p>I’m quite nervous I put 14 for that answer-- it’s possible I didn’t read the question carefully and just calculated numbers of moles-- does anybody remember if that was an option? If it wasn’t, I probably picked the right answer.</p>
<p>If I am to do badly on this test (below 750), is it feasible for me to do any better if I take it in the fall (I am going to be a junior, and sadly I could not fit AP chemistry into my schedule)</p>
<p>Also-- if I do happen to get a 700-750… is that respectable enough to send to an ivy? (I am extremely interested in biochemistry, etc… so this is the main field of interest that I want to advertise)</p>
<p>what was the answer to the water boiling boiling point pressure T/F<br>
LMAO I ACCIDENTALLY GOT THIS QUESTION RIGHT
wow so far so good</p>
<p>74-77/85 raw score hoping to score 770 or higher</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure that the curve for 800 on our test will be 78/85 becaue I was looking back at the May 1994 and it had a question on Pb(no3) which I’m pretty sure was on our test even though our question was different. I also noticed the code of the test which was 3PAC2 while ours was 4PAC3 ( I have very strong memory). I looked at the code for the 2005 edition BB book which had a much different code of 3YAC7. Also if you go on sparknotes.com and browse the sparknotes SAT 2 Chemistry message board, you will notice a test for the JUNE 2006 SAT 2 CHEMISTRY WHICH HAD THE SAME EXACT QUESTIONS AS OUR TEST( GO ON THE SITE IF YOU DON’t BELIEVE ME) and they had high scores after getting a handful of questions wrong.</p>
<p>^ Oh? That’s comforting. Question: whenever we say that the curve will be 78/85, does that mean the entire scale is more generous, or only strictly for the 800s? For example, would a 74/85 be 10-20 points higher than the Blue Book score, or still remain the same?</p>
<p>its probably gona be like all the other curves on any random practice test</p>
<p>Yes the entire scale. Also f- smallest radius. Oxgen family. Atomic size decreases from left to right</p>
<p>^ yep all right</p>
<p>I know this has been discussed previously, but does anyone have a convincing argument about what the scale is going to be?</p>
<p>its gonna be 80 for 800 cuz i say so</p>
<p>probably 79/85, but there is still a chance of it being 78/85</p>
<p>collegeboard is REALLY random sometimes lol</p>
<p>there was a really easy balancing problem
where you had to find the coiffecent of O2 was it 8 moles?</p>
<p>also just to confirm this answer al203 was .250</p>
<p>@Pjax (a page back) - Yes, you can take tests up until November or December for regular decisions, and October for early action/decision. Scores above 700 are considered good, but I would go for at least 750, just to be safe.</p>
<p>Okay so I was just talking to someone (I trust their opinion but this kind of threw me off) and said that 7 omittances/3 wrong would be around 740-750 on this test becaue it was “very easy.” However, on most scales that translates to a 780. Would a scale that sharp even be possible? I’m now really worried because while I’ve heard that the test was easy, I didn’t think it would compute to a curve where a 780 would suddenly become a 740. Help!</p>
<p>That’s probably closer to a 760. </p>
<p>Remember, there will ALWAYS be people who think the test is easy, people who think it’s average, and people who think it’s hard. Trying to approximate the curve based on a single person’s performance will yield little.</p>