<p>What would 2 wrong 5 omit look like?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>790 or 800.</p>
<p>what about like 7 wrong</p>
<p>i think i got an 800, this was a pretty dang easy test :D</p>
<ol>
<li>parametric one- 1/3</li>
<li>absolute value- b </li>
<li>find AB, 2 theta-2sin theta</li>
<li>angle with 2/5 and 3/5-9 </li>
<li>cone was 18.88</li>
<li>there was question that did not work with any of the answers.</li>
<li>t>=3 ot1. period was sin 2pi</li>
<li>g(x)- 3</li>
<li>sqrt of( 2+sqrt 2)-2 </li>
<li>miles-less than 50 miles</li>
<li>range-(1,2,3)</li>
<li>f(3) - f(1)-61. 1.5 radian to degrees- 86. </li>
<li>5 judges </li>
<li>last one-987 (according to people) </li>
<li>angle was 9. something</li>
<li>(8,12)</li>
<li>2-1/n</li>
</ol>
<p>If I had to guess I got about 3-5 wrong and omitted 4-5. What’s that? A 750?</p>
<p>Well you can make all the analogies you want, but I can never consider plugging values into a calculator an achievement, much less mathematics (which, at its core, deals with learning cool patterns about how the world works). I understand that as a junior you’ve had different experiences with these tests, but I personally don’t see the SAT IIs as measuring mathematical “accomplishments” if everyone can just plug and chug their way to an 800.</p>
<p>And I realize why everyone frets about the SATs, and it’s obviously a good thing to work hard. But at the same time, there’s no use crying over spilled milk now is there? Just forget about the test and don’t worry about your results! 19 days isn’t too long to wait now is it? :)</p>
<p>And that concludes my third post on this website. I hope I have cleared up any misconceptions you had on what I was saying.</p>
<p>The last one was 1036.8 I’m pretty sure.</p>
<p>Of course, the test isn’t great at measuring how well one reasons through more meaningful mathematics; it isn’t designed to. It is designed to measure how well a student can solve basic problems that most students cover in high-school math courses. Calculators are a big part of that.</p>
<p>Isn’t it a measure of how well you cope with standardized tests?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Well, obviously every standardized test is most directly a measure of how well you take the test. But we’re talking about what is actually being tested.</p>
<p>I think I’m looking at 1 wrong, 1 omitted which I take it is an 800 but we’ll see.</p>
<p>What’d you guys get for the other root besides 2 + 3i? Was it not enough information or 2 - 3i?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That’s very safely within 800 range.</p>
<p>i put 2-3i</p>
<p>It’s safe to say that, in a quadratic equation, imaginary roots always come in conjugate pairs.</p>
<p>"I think I’m looking at 1 wrong, 1 omitted which I take it is an 800 but we’ll see.</p>
<p>What’d you guys get for the other root besides 2 + 3i? Was it not enough information or 2 - 3i? "</p>
<p>2-3i is the conjugate of 2+3i, which makes a real number.</p>
<p>I thought this was a pretty hard test, don’t know about the rest of you. Thinkin about 5 wrong, 5 omitted now. I’m a junior and I’m avging about an A- in Advanced Precalculus. Got 740 on SAT I Math.</p>
<p>For the laser one I am 99% sure it is 987 (law of Sines or simple tangent equation). The only way I see people getting 1037 is if they forget to subtract 50.</p>
<p>what do you guys think is omit 8 and minus like 2</p>
<p>if one of the questions didn’t have a proper answer… would that lower the curve?
i think i got 2 wrong and i ommited 5… is that possible for a …800?</p>
<p>@fresh, it was asking how far off from the real mark would it be. If the radius is 50, the real mark should be in the center.</p>