<p>so did we confirm that like number 8 or 9 in the real improving sentences was A? the one about the black guy going into politics, and that “he had planned on” instead of changing it to “he had been planning”</p>
<p>nvrmind, it is A bc it stays in the past perfect. .had been would be present perfect</p>
<p>Which one was the experimental one? Was it the one with stonehenge sentence error ? Or not? Section 3 or 6?</p>
<p>Stonehenge was not experimental, I remember it and I had a math experimental.</p>
<p>ARGHHH my writing was HORRIBLE!</p>
<p>sorry guys. I need a confirmation. Did you guys have the passage about braces (about a girl who has to wear braces and then compares herself to Tom Cruise) in one Writing section?</p>
<p>^ I didn’t even get that passage an I had an experimental passage. So, yes that Tom Cruise passage was experimental</p>
<p>Thanks but are you American? I’m international and I have two 25min writing sections. One includes that Tom Cruise braces and the other includes a passage about Williams sisters. Someone said that you American guys have the same writing section. Can anyone confirm that?</p>
<p>apparently we americans didn’t have the same test</p>
<p>so no braces and no Willams sisters? Thanks.</p>
<p>So… any consensus on the “intent about” question?</p>
<p>Guys, I remember a sentence that was roughly like this one:</p>
<p>The works of Estonian author James Jarka were not written in his native language.</p>
<p>I said “his native” was wrong since “his” has no antecedent. The phrase “of Estonian author James Jarka” is a prepositional (adjective) phrase so I thought it was not a proper antecedent. What do you guys think?</p>
<p>^ I vaguely recall marking that one part of that sentence was wrong. I’m not sure of the exact wording anymore, though.</p>
<p>^ i remember that one, but the error was not an ambiguous pronoun… simo, i think the consensus is that “intent about” was an error</p>
<p>anybody remember the improving sentence one along the lines of “Before he went into politics, so and so had planned on” … i debated whether to keep it the same or change “had planned on” to “had been planning on”</p>
<p>Anyone remember a question that said something like “were they…, the workers would’ve put off the strike”.</p>
<p>I believe this was question 11 of the 25 minute section.</p>
<p>The wording was:</p>
<p>The works of estonian author james jarka, which were written in prussian and some other language, were not written in his native language of estonian. </p>
<p>error or no error?</p>
<p>^ was that a rewording sentence?</p>
<p>if i filled up all but 2 and a half lines, and wrote an introduction paragraph, and 3 detail/support paragraphs, with just a concluding sentence (not a concluding paragraph), what score can i anticipate for my essay? I also included two or three examples. One was about debates, one about college admission officers looking for variety, and i can’t remember if i had a 3rd example.</p>
<p>I don’t remember the estonian author one-- was it experimental?</p>
<p>It wasn’t experimental (I had 4 CR sections). It also wasn’t a rewording one.</p>