<p>@swedish, i saw the question as asking how large the population would be at t=48 if it grew another 15000…at t=0, the population was 15000, at t=24, population was 30000. with a growth rate like 0 < t < 24, at t=48, the population would be 30000 + 15000
i know 45000 isn’t 50000 but it was the closest answer…</p>
<p>I could 100% guarantee that the question was
“How large would the population be at 48 hours if it followed the growth pattern from 0 to 24 hours.”</p>
<p>Balthazar, I was answering someone else’s question about what he/she would get if they got -3 or something (800 wasn’t the answer to anything. Except maybe our hopes D: ) </p>
<p>SwedishM8, from 0-24 hrs, if you cut the rest of the graph off, was a linear function. I remember calculating the slope, and it was 1 1/2 box up for every box to the right, I think.</p>
<p>I’m not going to continue to pursue this question.
I’m pretty certain that I am correct. The line was definitely, in no way shape or form a linear. It was 200% definitely an exponential.</p>
<p>oh haha ok</p>
<p>@kili16
thanks 
and
does anyone remember the answer choices to the vine question? the correct ones (was it E for the first one?)</p>
<p>The entire line was exponential. 0-24 hrs was linear. I’m very certain of this as well ._.;</p>
<p>For the vine was the first answer was E.</p>
<p>Then it was D.</p>
<p>Then the graph was C.</p>
<p>Someone’s conceited…
If you look at the graph from 0-24 it’s pretty much linear, it’s only during 24-48 that it begins growing exponentially. Just my two cents.</p>
<p>Ok then only 1 wrong from that section PHEW thanks swedish! :)</p>
<p>MOLECULAR SECTION there was the mitosis thing at the end and they asked where it was from?? bacteria? plant? what was the answer?</p>
<p>Also, imagine the accumulation of wastes in humans. If all of the CO2 continually accumulates in a closed environment, then humans’ll die</p>
<p>^^ Plant. There was a cell plate forming.</p>
<p>also does atp initiate the muscle contraction or something? was that the answer?</p>
<p>what was the answer to the ATP in muscles question. was it the ATP changes the length of Myesin or something</p>
<p>wait what was the cell plate? the line separating them? i don’t remember seeing it O_O</p>
<p>Umm there was no cell wall forming there were two fully formed animal cells</p>
<p>The answer to the ATP one was the movement of the myosin. The others either tlked about acetilcoline or calcium</p>
<p>Yes there was a cell plate forming. Also, you didnt have centrioles so it was a plant</p>
<p>I put bacteria… IDK what were the answer choices?</p>
<p>also “There is no shortening, thickening, or folding of the individual filaments.” I don’t think myosin lengthens… someone confirm the answer?</p>
<p>Calm down.
I already said that I had a brain-fart on that question. No need to bash me for it.
You’re the one being overly conceited currently.</p>