<p>MIT 36
Stanford 35
Harvard 30
Yale 26</p>
<ul>
<li>MIT, - Yale</li>
</ul>
<p>MIT 36
Stanford 35
Harvard 30
Yale 26</p>
<ul>
<li>MIT, - Yale</li>
</ul>
<p>This is going to take forever…</p>
<p>It’s been going for 6 weeks now…</p>
<p>MIT 37
Stanford 35
Harvard 30
Yale 25</p>
<p>+MIT, -Yale</p>
<p>MIT 37
Stanford 36
Harvard 30
Yale 24</p>
<p>+Stanfod, -Yale</p>
<p>MIT 38
Stanford 36
Harvard 29
Yale 24</p>
<p>+MIT -Harvard</p>
<p>MIT 37
Stanford 36
Harvard 30
Yale 24</p>
<p>+H, -M</p>
<p>MIT 36
Stanford 36
Harvard 31
Yale 24</p>
<ul>
<li>Harvard, - MIT</li>
</ul>
<p>Stanford 37
MIT 36
Harvard 30
Yale 24</p>
<p>+s, -h</p>
<p>Stanford 37
MIT 36
Harvard 29
Yale 25</p>
<p>-h, +y</p>
<p>MIT 37
Stanford 36
Harvard 29
Yale 25</p>
<ul>
<li>MIT; -Stanford</li>
</ul>
<p>MIT 37
Stanford 37
Harvard 28
Yale 25</p>
<ul>
<li>Stanford, - Harvard</li>
</ul>
<p>MIT 38
Stanford 37
Harvard 27
Yale 25</p>
<p>MIT +1
Harvard - 1</p>
<p>MIT 38
Stanford 38
Harvard 27
Yale 24</p>
<p>+Stanford
-Yale</p>
<p>all for instituting the +1/-2 rule? or cut everyone by 15? these numbers are a bit ridiculous…</p>
<p>Sorry, I’ve been busy. Universal -15 time!!</p>
<p>MIT 23
Stanford 23
Harvard 12
Yale 9</p>
<p>Let the battle begin! Oh wait, my vote…</p>
<p>MIT 23
Stanford 23
Harvard 13
Yale 8</p>
<p>+1 Harvard, -1 Yale</p>
<p>What about +1/-2?</p>
<p>MIT 23
Stanford 23
Harvard 12
Yale 9</p>
<p>+Y -H</p>
<p>Stanford 24
MIT 23
Harvard 12
Yale 8</p>
<ul>
<li>Stanford, - Yale</li>
</ul>
<p>Stanford 25
MIT 22
Harvard 12
Yale 8</p>
<ul>
<li>Stanford, - MIT</li>
</ul>
<p>Stanford 25
MIT 23
Harvard 12
Yale 7</p>
<ul>
<li>MIT - Yale</li>
</ul>