<p>the level of students at Middlebury…
with which national university’s students is it comparable? the Ivies?</p>
<p>It is one of the Top Liberal Arts Schools- comparable to Williams and Amherst</p>
<p>I mean comparable with National Universities, not other LAC’s</p>
<p>ohh… how about Duke and Georgetown?!</p>
<p>well, IF you believe that USNews’ peer assessment score (which is a subjective reputation index) gets you in the ballpark for this comparison (& there is plenty of debate on Peer scores here on CC), here’s how the landscape for Top National Universities & Top LACs look combined.</p>
<p>Peer score ranking
Rank/School/Score
- Harvard 4.9
- MIT 4.9
- Princeton 4.9
- Stanford 4.9
- Yale 4.9
- Amherst 4.7
- Cal Berkeley 4.7
- Cal Tech 4.7
- Chicago 4.7
- Williams 4.7
- Columbia 4.6
- Cornell 4.6
- JHU 4.6
- Swarthmore 4.6
- Duke 4.5
- Michigan 4.5
- Penn 4.5
- Wellesley 4.5
- Brown 4.4
- Dartmouth 4.4
- Northwestern 4.4
- Carleton 4.4
- Bowdoin 4.3
- Middlebury 4.3******
- Pomona 4.3
- Smith 4.3
- UCLA 4.3
- Virginia 4.3
- Wesleyan 4.3
- Bryn Mawr 4.2
- Carnegie Mellon 4.2
- Grinnell 4.2
- Haverford 4.2
- Oberlin 4.2
- UNC 4.2
- Wisconsin 4.2
- Davidson 4.1
- Georgetown 4.1
- Harvey Mudd 4.1
- Rice 4.1
- Texas 4.1
- Vanderbilt 4.1
- Vassar 4.1
- Washington USTL 4.1</p>
<p>So, looking at national u’s with peer score within +/- 0.1 from Middlebury’s 4.3, you have:</p>
<p>Brown
Dartmouth
Northwestern
UCLA
Virginia
Carnegie Mellon
UNC
Wisconsin</p>
<p>Of course, “level of students” is not precisely peer academic reputation.</p>
<p>To read a bit into your question, I think you’ll see students in general on par with some of the “lower” ivies & some other very strong national u’s.</p>
<p>Taking a long-term view, with the rise in college applicants over the past decade & fixed supply from the historic elite institutions, someone who was a sure thing at an Ivy not too long ago, may now be looking at the high-LACs…put another way, colleges like Middlebury are surely enrolling now folks who would have been Ivy in the recent past…for what its worth.</p>