I know that no one here can answer in an official capacity, but I wonder if my liability concerns are off-base or crazy. If I’m worrying about nothing, I’ll shut up.
I own condos in a complex that also manages long-term leases (the management corp is based in Texas, but the property is in Alabama. This company has only managed the property for about a year, and I don’t think they are familiar with AL laws. For instance, until I told the complex manager that in Alabama, a person is not an adult until age 19, he didn’t know that and had been letting 18 year olds sign lease contracts without parents. Alabama is one of the few states - may be the only state - that has age 19 as the age of majority))
Here’s the background.
Complex has hosted 2-3 publicly advertised pool parties in order to attract new leases.
Each of these parties has been extremely well-attended by young people…crowded pool decks and crowded in the pools…the complex is upscale and very nice.
No lifeguards or security people are present during these times, only a few complex employees are present. (Correction, one time they had security, but then deemed them to be an unnecessary expense for future parties)
Food, soft drinks, and music is provided, along with the pools, etc.
Prospective Lessees (many/most who are under 21) come to these events. Many bring beer and it is not hidden in the least.
The “only” concern of the mgmt company seems to be “glass bottles”. Beer in cans, mini-kegs, etc are acceptable (again, not supplied by complex).
Nothing is done to determine if any of these “guests” are under 21 and drinking. There are laws specific to underage drinking in Alabama
There is also no concern that anyone of any age is drinking and then driving.
When I confronted the property manager that these parties were exposing the property/owners to a lawsuit if anyone (particularly someone under 21) left these parties and got into a car accident. The mgr insisted that I was worrying about nothing because A) they weren’t supplying the alcohol. B) it’s a public area (which I then countered with “pick your poison…if it’s public, then no one can drink in public here, if it’s private, then someone can be held responsible.” )
the one thing he kept hanging his hat on is that “an accident has never happened and they’ve never been sued before.” lol. I wonder how many companies have said THAT before they were hit with a big ole lawsuit…and later found liable?
I also told him that nothing was being done to prevent underage drinking. And he agreed that they did nothing to determine the ages of those who were openly drinking. (Beer pong was being played and some mini-kegs were clearly visible, so there would be no way to argue that mgmt wasn’t aware of the drinking, and possible/likely drinking by underage people).
I’m guessing that if the police were called during this time, all the under 21 drinking kids would be cited. I don’t know if the property would be cited for anything.
There hasn’t been any outrageous behaviors (no fights, etc), but I’ve noticed in nationwide reports in college towns that when drinking young folks end up fighting, it’s often over “over a girl” …and with many bikini’d beauties around a pool, the possibility exists that some intoxicated guy might take offense at a comment or action by another intoxicated guy. (I don’t mean to sound sexist, but literally every time I read online about fights at events like this, it’s nearly always intoxicated guys fighting over some girl. But, I’m sure that there are times when girls fight over boys…lol.)
Side issues, but not completely unrelated…
I also pointed out that these young folks (mostly college students ) can’t qualify and need guarantors of the rent (rent is high here), so hosting these parties when parents aren’t there to sign/guarantee rent is a bit short-sighted…kids just coming for free food and a party…lol.
The mgr said that he has these kids sign leases, and then it’s their responsible to get the guarantor, but if they can’t get the guarantor, then they aren’t allowed to move in BUT HE will still collect the rent for a year. (I question how legal that is since I thought a contact can’t be valid/enforced if (in this case) the landlord won’t let the contract holder ever move in. It’s not as if the signer is guilty of fraud, which would be a different situation.) I would think that the demand that a guarantor signature be provided would void the contract if one could not be provided. Maybe deposit would be lost, but I can’t see how rent could be collected when refusing to let them move in. (And , of course, he doesn’t have valid contracts with any 18 year olds where a parent hasn’t also signed, since 18 year olds are still minors in this state.)
I don’t know if a complex pool area falls under a “public area” or private area. I’m guessing that it’s a private area because it’s private property and not “open to the public”. I believe that in this city and state, “public drinking” is very controlled (permits, etc), and you can’t just be out in public drinking. And of course, public drunkenness is not permitted either.
Maybe I’m just a nervous old lady, but I just don’t think these parties are wise and are exposing the complex to a potential lawsuit.
Thoughts? (again, I understand that no one can answer in an official capacity.)