<p>Can anyone post a list of UG acceptance rates for major universities and colleges? They’re so hard to look up…</p>
<p>Here’s what I know:</p>
<p>Stanford University: 7.6%
UCSC: 63.6%
UCSD: 38.2%</p>
<p>Where can you find data like this - especially this early? Who publishes this data? I’m still trying to find data for the 2008-09 year.</p>
<p>^that is why this thread was made in the first place</p>
<p>the 2009 data is definitely out there…the bloggers already have it</p>
<p>Brown University: 10.8%
MIT: 10.2%
Stanford University: 7.6%
UCSC: 63.6%
UCSD: 38.2%
Yale University: 7.5%</p>
<p>(all of those, i think, are record lows)</p>
<p>c’mon people…help me out</p>
<p>Where do the bloggers get their information and how credible is it?</p>
<p>some schools have published the information themselves, if i’m not mistaken. for example - <a href=“You’ve requested a page that no longer exists | Stanford News”>You’ve requested a page that no longer exists | Stanford News;
<p>the vast majority of college have already released some admissions data…</p>
<p>Brown University: 10.8%
Columbia University: 9.8%
MIT: 10.2%
Stanford University: 7.6%
UCSC: 63.6%
UCSD: 38.2%
Yale University: 7.5%</p>
<p>This is the danger in people posting data without qualification and without sources. The Stanford data is for Restricted Early Decision through December. Taking data from a blog is likewise dangerous. The same with believing the exaggerated stats on CC.</p>
<p>unless i’m reading it wrong (which is possible, since my english usually fails when i’m sleep-deprived), doesn’t the stanford one say that the figure INCLUDES the early action acceptances, but is actually the total for the RD’s sent out in the mail on the 1st? now i’m terribly confused.</p>
<p>You are correct and I stand corrected!</p>
<p>i’m not saying ‘take this stuff blindly’…it’s just so hard to find data for any college that’s an ivy</p>
<p>That’s fine, but if people can reference their data source, as with Stanford, that would be helpful.</p>
<p>[Admission</a> rate rises to 9.79 percent for Class of 2013 - The Daily Princetonian](<a href=“http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2009/04/01/23213/]Admission”>http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2009/04/01/23213/) - i would assume that the princeton figures are correct if the students are getting it from their own school. the validity of the other schools’ referenced rates is questionable but more news pages for these schools probably offer … uh, validation.</p>
<p>Vanderbilt Univ. 18.9%</p>
<p>[The</a> Vandy Admissions Blog Blog Archive 2009 Decision Letters Have Been Mailed](<a href=“http://www.vanderbilt.edu/Admissions/vandybloggers/2009/03/2009-decision-letters-have-been-mailed/]The”>2009 Decision Letters Have Been Mailed | The Vandy Admissions Blog | Vanderbilt University)</p>
<p>The admissions offices of many schools have official blogs of their own, and they publish this data.</p>
<p>oops…what i meant to say was “any college that’s not an ivy”</p>
<p>continue…</p>
<p>I calculated Tufts (from the Dean’s blog) and for RD alone, not including ED, the rate is 22.7%.</p>
<p>Anyone know UCIs?
I know they went down</p>
<p>“This is the danger in people posting data without qualification and without sources. The Stanford data is for Restricted Early Decision through December. Taking data from a blog is likewise dangerous. The same with believing the exaggerated stats on CC.”</p>
<p>The Stanford data includes Restricted Early Decision candidates, but isn’t limited to them. Check the link: 30,428 applicants, 2,300 offered admission, including the 628 Restricted Early Decision candidates. (They actually rounded up to get to 7.6%.)</p>
<p>[Stanford</a> admission rate is most competitive ever](<a href=“You’ve requested a page that no longer exists | Stanford News”>You’ve requested a page that no longer exists | Stanford News)</p>
<p>According to the waitlist letter Cornell was 9.1% this year. Harvard only gave the applicant number not number accepted but I would guess around 5%.</p>