<p>Which one is more selective… I know there totally different programs im just interested in which one is more difficult to get into</p>
<p>Probably similar in selectivity. Though Fisher has a longer history so more people might know about it than Huntsman.</p>
<p>Depends… I think the applicant pools are much more self-selective, really. I’d say they’re both decently selective, but I don’t know any of the numbers off the top of my head.</p>
<p>huntsman more so.</p>
<p>people can always apply to MT in their first year at penn, I recall. plus I think each MT class is somewhat larger than the huntsman class capped around 50</p>
<p>nope M&T is 50 as well</p>
<p>i think it’s about the same</p>
<p>if nothing else, there’s no more than 50 members of each year’s m+t facebook group heh</p>
<p>they’re both about 50, both heavily international. space in M&T for transfers WAS based on the number of people who leave, but I believe they’ve ended that practice as well (no more transfers). both extremely self-selective (only people who are very interested apply, so there aren’t many applicants)</p>