Mad Men

<p>I take what Matt Weiner says with 2 grains of salt. </p>

<p>Reacting against what I see in reviews, I thought this was a very positive ending. Pete is free of his mother and his brother and his hideous father-in-law. He’s free of Detroit, which is a place he only wanted to be because he hated what his life in NYC and at SD&P had become. Ted has committed to his family. Peggy has more responsibility. Roger is no longer a drunk wasting his days away. </p>

<p>These are mostly mixed messages. Pete shows love for his daughter. Peggy is miserable outside of work. Roger’s relationship with his daughter has become terrible even as he gets a chance to have one with his son with Joan. </p>

<p>Take Megan. A little more than 1 season ago she was miserable. Her parents would run her down as lacking talent, as being nothing more than a want to be artist. In one season she went from a small part on a soap to meetings in Hollywood. This is her dream. If it includes marriage to Don, we’ll see. And note that Don didn’t say “you can’t go”. He said they’d be “bicoastal”, a word that may have been used then (I don’t remember). He’s not holding her back. </p>

<p>I think, for example, Matt Weiner is in his comments harder on Don than the actual scripts are. In the one where he begins and ends curled up in a fetal position, the message becomes in this last episode that this wasn’t stagnation but birth. And when Peggy calls him a monster it’s true but not because of what he did with St. Joseph’s aspirin, which was the right business decision. Those interactions, like calling back Harry Crane about Sunkist, were for the good of the firm. As I pointed out, the 5 million in extra billings over Ocean Spray is $750k in commissions at a minimum. Seeing that Ted was infatuated and making those decisions could be seen as a war on Ted but they could also be seen as helping Ted see what he was doing while helping the firm. Imagine St. Joe’s reaction when they found their $15k budget had risen to $35k or $50k. Matt Weiner puts spin on things when he talks about the show. That’s one way he guards it.</p>

<p>As for Don, I think the genius in the last episode was in the way they tied all those flashbacks and all that loneliness in Dick’s life to Sally. Don’s mother died at birth. His father was killed by a horse. His step-mother treated him like dirt. He had no choice. This stuff happened to him. We saw he was crushed by Sally catching him cheating with Sylvia. Now we see he connected at least some of the dots: this doesn’t have to happen to her. When he would wish for a normal life, he has it in his power to give at least a better life to her … and Bobby and even Gene though he’s too young to have lines that matter. When he says to Betty, “Birdie, it’s not your fault”, he knows that so much of it is his fault. He also finally seems to have realized that what happened to him wasn’t his fault. That is one of the hardest lessons: you internalize and act out but even if you can see why you can’t forgive yourself for it. And where does that lesson appear? In this episode. The interlude with the preacher sets up a flashback where Mac tosses another preacher out, saying “I’d say go to hell but I never want to see you again.” The preacher turns and says, I think, that the only unforgiveable sin is believing God won’t forgive you. It’s very hard to forgive yourself. </p>

<p>I thought the firing from SD&P opens a lot of plot doors they can use to make the final season. It resets the show. BTW, to note how Matt Weiner talks, in one interview he says this is essentially a firing and in another he’s more cagey saying it is what they said it is. </p>

<p>But overall, the show has always been about whether Don can be happy with himself. It began with uncovering the depths to which he sublimated himself, even to the point of rejecting his brother. It has expressed itself through his family with Betty, then with incarnations of work, then with Megan, and of course through increasingly desperate affairs. The message as I saw it shifted now to become more direct. This is Don. He’s being himself. We always believe that being yourself brings happiness. It may. But that happiness may well involve a lot of dislocation - and heartache - along the way. But at least we see Don trying to live his life as himself.</p>

<p>I mentioned the last season ended with the image of Don showing that predatory smile. Was he back to being the pretend Don Draper? The last image of this season is that of a father seen from his child’s perspective. Crisp collar. Hat. Black hair. Firm jaw.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>We’ll have to disagree on this one. I took it immediately that Don recognized his chance to get over on Ted, as soon as he and Megan saw him with Peggy. Yes Don was able to hang his crusade against Ted on a business decision, but that’s not why he did it, according to the man who wrote it.</p>

<p>As with novels, everyone will overlay their own interpretation on things. To me this last episode was Don sinking as low as he could go, including using Stan’s words to get the California office, then giving it to Ted so he could tell Megan, oops, guess this won’t work out like I said after all. I didn’t actually get any rebirth out of it at all - until I read Weiner saying, that’s what it is supposed to mean, as I created it!</p>

<p>I just stumbled on this thread a week ago and was intrigued by what I started reading. Logged into Netflix and started watching S1/E1 / hooked after 4 episodes. I have decided that this is my motivation to walk on the treadmill. I set the iPad on the book holder and must walk to view an episode. Maybe by Christmas I’ll be in shape and caught up on the story line. Yes, I skipped to the end of the thread so I didn’t spoil it for myself… Loved the styles of the 60’s!</p>

<p>I might feel differently about Don’s actions if I thought he cared about work. We’ve seen a lot of evidence his heart isn’t really there. It goes back at least to when Megan was at SCDP and Roger referred to him as floating around in a honeymoon. He was happy showing up but that was because he was happy having Megan with him and being able to leave with her. He was then motivated to make the agency successful - the great scene at Dow where he talks about getting what you want only being a step to the next thing you want as you always chase it. See? He was chasing that, maybe because he thought it was what he could do, maybe because it was the challenge in front of him or because he thought he could pull it off. We also know he chased that success because his honeymoon ended when Megan realized she wasn’t happy in advertising. She went to chase her dream and he put effort into chasing the dream of a successful agency. It paid off; the first scenes in the agency show them doing work for Dow. </p>

<p>My attitude is partly influenced by the fact writers aren’t actually business people. They aren’t going to say work is more important than family as the meaning of life. They show people struggling with happiness at home even as they are happy at work and vice versa but the moral judgement always comes down on the side of family, love and children being more important than selling. </p>

<p>My attitude is also influenced by a fact I mentioned before: Don has money. He sold out his ownership to the British. Pete mentions this bitterly at the start of this season; Don, he says, doesn’t care whether he (or Joan) make money in an IPO because he (Don) has money. Add to this that firing or putting on leave doesn’t take away his ownership of SC&P. We know the partners include Roger, Bert, Jim, Ted, Don, Joan and Pete, with the latter 2 being junior. That means SC&P either has to buy him out - I’ve written agreements like that - or they have to keep paying him his share. I doubt he needs to work. </p>

<p>So he cares about his kids. More than he cares about moving to CA with Megan. Maybe that reflects the hard choices people need to make: the kids are there and her career needs to be out there. </p>

<p>I’m a little disappointed they didn’t do more to show the contrast and “synergy” between Ted’s and Don’s styles. Don is about emotional connection. In that great Heinz pitch, he talked about getting into the consumer’s head so your commercial plays there all day. Couple that with Ted’s style and they had something. But for all I know, they both are in CA in the next season.</p>

<p>I think I may really stick out as different about Don’s absolute taking of Stan’s idea. Why? Because Don has real connections to CA. His roots are in 2 places: poverty and then the whorehouse in PA and out in CA with Anna Draper. He’s Dick Whitman from PA and he’s Don Draper from CA. Remember how he painted “Anna & Dick” on the wall of that house. Remember also he showed that to Sally and she asked who Dick is. Now he’s actually showing her where Dick lived. </p>

<p>So I see that Don grabbed on to Stan’s idea because it fit him. Stan just has this image of CA. Maybe it’s where he can smoke better dope and draw. But to Don it’s not just where he connected with Megan but where his emotional center rested with Anna Draper. That was the only place we ever saw him being himself.</p>

<p>Remember, Ted also grabbed the idea. Because it fit his need. And that need was actually exactly what Don needed as well: connection with his children. </p>

<p>I wouldn’t be surprised if Don only engages peripherally with SC&P next season. They seem intent on following Peggy’s life. And Pete’s, unless they’ve decided to leave him alone. Peggy has that great line in Don’s office: this is where everything is. Yes. That’s where everything is as long as you don’t include everything that’s not there. But my guess is they’ll continue to disappoint her at work because this is still 1968 and they’re going to bring in a man to be the NY creative director if Ted is in LA. That, btw, is the one thing that makes no sense. The obvious business move would be to tell Peggy sorry but you have to leave the agency. She can be replaced but Ted acting as creative director in LA makes no sense from a business perspective. But they didn’t want to write Peggy off the show.</p>

<p>yup, totally get what CA means to Don - most importantly the most important person in his life (Anna) before she died, coupled with he is happy everytime he is there. I also get that he is making his choices so his kids don’t have the same experiences with parental role models in his life as he did, and I appreciate how it ties up so nicely (coverging the past into the now). So he is going to stay miserable in NY for his kids? He’s been completely self-centered and in turmoil for 6 seasons, completely about work (I disagree with you there, I think he loves it, though I see your point about the writers). I am just struggling with the turn-around; in a way it seems TOO simple for me. Which I know is weird because it’s anything but simple. I do think the series will end, where it began, about Don.</p>

<p>I don’t think it’s necessary to have worked in an office in manhattan to understand what it’s like to be driven by work, especially if it is the one thing you’re really good at, and to explore the effect of that on relationships. That’s pretty universal.</p>

<p>You reinforced my exact point Lergnom…Don is not a team player, never has been, and hasn’t cared about the agency for a very long time. He’s now fully consumed by his own demons and compulsions (one of which lately has been besting his counterpart, not to mention his one so-called friend).</p>

<p>The show is all about Don’s arc. Certainly season 7 will complete it, one way or the other.</p>

<p>Finally, California is itself an important character in the show. For those of us who were young in the 1960s (most of the parents on this forum, I imagine), the idea (fantasy?) of “California” rings a fairly loud bell, just as it does for a large number of Weiner’s creations.</p>

<p>I was also surprised that reviewers thought Don hit rock bottom in this episode. My take was that the ending was positive: Don may have lost Meaghan, but he’s making an effort to reconnect with his kids; he gave Ted California; and he’s now free to get the rest of his life together. </p>

<p>I also appreciated some of the dark humor around Pete. The actor who plays him is so good at making Pete such a dufus… Love the model ship in the background as he discusses his mother’s fate over the phone… love the idea of them deciding, hmmm, it may not be worth what’s left of our money to pursue Monolo. </p>

<p>Loved how quickly Bob got his revenge on Pete in Detroit – don’t underestimate this Zelig – and how that totally defeated Pete. </p>

<p>Loved how Sally’s adopted Miss Porter’s manners (“Sally Draper speaking… I’m sorry my calendar’s full”) while staying true to character (“Why don’t YOU tell them what I saw.”) I loved how Betty seemed genuinely anguished at the idea of failing her daughter. </p>

<p>And Peggy, in Don’s office, wearing that great pant suit (I swear I had one just like that in 7th grade) photographed from the back, just like Don in the opening credits. </p>

<p>Terrific episode.</p>

<p>I just watched the whole thing again, and it struck me that it makes perfect sense for the partners to be fed up with Don right now. The former SCDP faction had been living in their own bubble for a long time. Then they merge with CGC and see that there are other ways of doing things. They put up with a lot of Don’s BS because he did get results and they didn’t know any different. But now they know, and they’re tired of the drama. One thing I think could have been explored more closely this season - what made Roger pull his head at least partially out of his @$$ and start taking the whole thing a little more seriously?
Another thing that struck me about Don’s downward spiral is that it seems to reflect 1968 itself. As the world came apart, so did Don. And just as things have never been the same since 1968, Don will never be the same after these events.
And the look between Don and Sally outside the whorehouse - I really think it was the beginning of some healing between them. Hopefully they’ll build upon that next season.</p>

<p>Pete said he is going to California. Ted said he is going to California. But there is only room for one person out there. Who is actually going to California?</p>

<p>It’s in the air. What they do with the ad firm is going to be interesting. </p>

<p>So for example, they did that shot - mentioned by katliamom - where Peggy is sitting like Don in the credits but they’re bringing in a man for the NY job. You know they’re going to bring in a man. So she’ll be disappointed. And watching the show over, I was stunned by how aggressive she was with Ted, essentially trying to take over and be in charge. So they have that angle with her career and who she is. I suspect she’ll continue to be who she is and won’t change.</p>

<p>And that means things may not work in NY, that the firm needs someone - Ted or Don - back. And maybe Don walks away at the end. Who knows?</p>

<p>I thought they showed affection from Trudy toward Pete. She understands he’s finally growing up. Maybe she will too. Maybe she’ll be able to move away from that hypocrite daddy of hers. </p>

<p>I doubt Ted is gone but this structure of CA and NY has a lot of potential.</p>

<p>You know, I’d love to see this episode, or at least parts of it, done from the partners’ point of view … the covert meetings, the tense phone calls, the knowledge of “something needs to be done” and the whole thing coming to a head. </p>

<p>As for Pete going to California, I thought maybe he was going so Ted could stay and manage Creative in NY, but then, why would Duck be bringing in the guy from Danzer?</p>

<p>Arthur Conan Doyle did that one time; he told a story from the knowing perspective of Holmes instead of Watson. It was awful. Took away all the tension and wonder.</p>

<p>Dancer Fitzgerald was one of the large agencies then. They don’t tell us how big SC&P is but DF would have been at least 2x or more bigger. That means they’re looking at a corporate guy - and that guy wasn’t young - which is the literal opposite of SCDP and CGC. Maybe that doesn’t work so well. </p>

<p>I watched the last episode again with my wife last night before the hockey game. Noticed that Megan says the f word when Don says plans have changed. They have a moment of silence over it. I wonder if it was in the script or if Jessica Par</p>

<p>I love both Ted and Peggy, but I’m glad they didn’t break up his marriage over this. Neither of them would be the people they are if they could live comfortably with that.</p>

<p>I am tremendously fond of Roger, despite his flaws, and harbor a strong desire for him and Joan to marry and live happily ever after. :)</p>

<p>I found myself completely fatigued with Don’s sexual escapades and drinking this season. Utterly distasteful. Increasingly irritating and unpleasant. The interleaving of that and the flashes of his past brought things to a point of unbearable tension. The moment when he finally started to tell the truth was a huge release. Brilliantly done. The look with Sally at the end: such hope for the future.</p>

<p>I also have a soft spot for Roger, John Slattery is absolutely brilliant in this role. </p>

<p>Don’s sexual escapades were always fatiguing, except they shed a lot of light on this complicated (and in many ways tortured) character. Sometimes they redeemed him, sometimes damned him, but they were almost always revealing.</p>

<p>Slate has a terrific video up about Mad Men’s Vietnam references: [url=&lt;a href=“http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2013/06/25/mad_men_vietnam_video_essay_how_season_6_s_chevy_storyline_reflected_a_violent.html]Here[/url”&gt;Mad Men Vietnam video essay: How Season 6’s Chevy storyline reflected a violent year at war.]Here[/url</a>].</p>

<p>I knew for example that Don’s line to Ted “Lieutenant, want to get into some trouble” was him repeating PFC Dinkins, but most I’d never thought about except in the most general manner. Stan’s shirts. His wearing a bandana like Christopher Walken in Deer Hunter. The imagery matching a cover that appeared only a few weeks earlier of Ali’s draft resistance. Ken’s million dollar wound. Lots of good stuff. </p>

<p>I was talking with my kid - the one who works in the business - about the layered writing. The way a joke appears on a Chuck Lorre show (2 and 1/2 men, Big Bang Theory, etc.) first, then moves to another character to be told again and then reappears a 3rd time. The way the cross-references are used in How I Met Your Mother and are highlighted by bits of surreal re-living and re-doing of past moments. Other shows that did this like Will & Grace. </p>

<p>That kind of layering is what Mad Men takes to the umpteenth degree. Odds are pretty good every line recalls a line uttered earlier not in that episode but in that season or in seasons past. And the lines that don’t recall earlier words spoken in the show refer to off screen events. That Ali cover, for example, shows him tied up with arrows shot in him like St. Sebastian … which becomes Stan hit in the arm as the St. Sebastian reference is made. They work to make the show have a reality in the moment in which it is set. </p>

<p>BTW, one of my favorite things to do with the show is to stop at a shot and look at the set decorations. Every one is cool and perfect.</p>

<p>IKWYM, Lergnom. I ususally watch each episode several times, only I “look” at it rather than watch it. That’s how I stumble upon little unexpected pleasures, like Nan Chaough with Nicholas and Alexandra.</p>

<p>Cute: [15</a> predictions for Mad Men?s final act - Salon.com](<a href=“http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/fifteen_predictions_for_mad_mens_final_act/]15”>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/fifteen_predictions_for_mad_mens_final_act/)</p>

<p>As I watched, I really took notice of the writers efforts to illustrate that Don was at the now or never point in his alcoholism.<br>

  1. Drank first thing in the morning
  2. Drank to get rid of the shakes
  3. Drinking more of a priority than anything else i.e. work
  4. Arrest due to intoxication
  5. Causes personal harm to someone</p>

<p>During the previous episode, it dawned on me that Ted had a father-figure type notion of Don.<br>
He both wanted to impress him and compete with him. In this episode, he relates Don’s shakes to his father’s. He also begs Don to put his needs first, as a child would, and let him go to California. …interesting</p>

<p>During that conversation between Don and Ted where Ted says he wanted to go to Calif., Don says “I don’t understand.” Ted says yes you do and Don gives a weird look. What did Ted mean when he said yes you do?</p>

<p>^ He meant, you know very well I am in love with Peggy.</p>