<p>Sensationalism at its best. The real policy is there is no age limit. So someone takes it to the extreme and points out what is ‘possible’. Oh the horror!</p>
<p>They are not passing out condoms. They are very most likely not advertising to young kids ‘hey if you need a free condom come on by’. It’s most simply that the policy doesn’t specify an age limit (which frankly makes sense to me- what is the point otherwise…if a kid is having sex at whatever age- I would rather they have access to a condom than not and how are we supposed to be knowing in advance what that age should/is? so if you are 12, forget it! but 13, okay you are entitled to protection). Do I personally think this is healthy for young people to be having sex? Of course not but that isn’t the issue: the issue is protecting young people who might be.</p>