<p>Can somebody please compile this chart?:
NUMBER WRONG…HIGHEST NUMBER THAT CAN BE OMITTED TO GET AN 800
1
2
3
4
5
6
7</p>
<h2> 8</h2>
<p>NUMBER OMITTED…HIGHEST NUMBER THAT CAN BE WRONG TO GET AN 800
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8</p>
<p>Can somebody please compile this chart?:
NUMBER WRONG…HIGHEST NUMBER THAT CAN BE OMITTED TO GET AN 800
1
2
3
4
5
6
7</p>
<h2> 8</h2>
<p>NUMBER OMITTED…HIGHEST NUMBER THAT CAN BE WRONG TO GET AN 800
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8</p>
<p>You need to get a raw score of 45-46/50 on the real test (depending on curve).</p>
<p>I believe that is sufficient to help you calculate what you want to know.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>usually a raw score of around 43 or 44. If you want to be conservative, then 45 or 46.</p>
<p>The curve of math II is ridiculously low. I recall there was some 10% candidates get full mark, whereas math I has only 1%.
According to the 1995 real test I read in the library, 45/50 is more than sufficient for one to score full mark in Math II.</p>
<p>how do you compute/estimate a raw score?</p>
<p>+1 for right
-1/4 for wrong
0 for not attempted</p>