<p>did anyone get spare…ornate for one of the critical reading? or was it the embellish one</p>
<p>Also, what did everyone get for the decade (.81)^x problem?? did u all round to “increase 1000”?</p>
<p>Can someone please compile a list of final answers to the math section??? I’m freaking out over here??
20 or 36?
2000 or 700?
5/9 or 4/9?</p>
<p>I wrote 20, 2000, and 4/6. I was confident of them until I came here.</p>
<p>I wrote 20, 2000, and 5/9… I highly doubt that all of us really misread the sales question… that just doesn’t happen…</p>
<p>Also, what did everyone get for the decade (.81)^x problem?? did u all round to “increase 1000”?</p>
<p>No. Initial value with t=o is like 500. Then when t=2, it’s like 320. So it’s a decrease of 180.</p>
<p>I assure you the answer is SEVEN HUNDRED!!! … not 2000 </p>
<p>2000 = number of sales</p>
<p>question asked at what compensation [in $$] would this occur…so had to plug in 2000 sales to find compensation … so 700 = answer!!</p>
<p>I got the ‘embellish’ one …</p>
<p>Weve got to come back to this thread once we get our scores and make fun of each other for making the same ■■■■■■■■ mistakes, opr make fun of others if you happened to be right.</p>
<p>wow I would’ve failed the Grammar section if I wrote like my post above in the New SAT.</p>
<p>looooooool =]</p>
<p>All of us didn’t misread the sales question. It asked for compensation, which was 700.
The dividisibility probability question is 5/9, let’s put that one to bed.
And the combinations of coordinates is 20.</p>
<p>Was anyone else bothered by the fact that the population problem was a decrease of about 172. How the heck did CB round that into a decrease of 180? It was the only answer that made sense, but it’s just bad test design.</p>
<p>What really bothers me is that everyone is talking about having two grid ins… I had the same exact problems and passages, but I only had three math sections (2, 6 or 7 was grid in, and the short one). I’m confused…</p>
<p>Im sorry, I probably missed a lot of the conversation. Have we reached a consensus on the juan problem?</p>
<p>vu presus, if you had two 35 question writing sections, then that means you had the writing experimental.</p>
<p>are you sure about that??</p>
<p>I think our math section was pretty difficult. If I just missed one, will I have a shot at an 800 still?</p>
<p>Around how many can one miss and still score a 650-700 for the Math SAT I Reasoning?</p>
<p>I’d probably say that 5 wrong will get you a 700 and 8 or 9 wrong will be a 650.</p>