<p>The idea of “playing the race card” has now changed, and I think the change is dishonorable. It used to be that “playing the race card” meant decrying race as an unfair disadvantage in a contest where race in fact has no role at all. During the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings, for example, Thomas was hammered relentlessly so that his confirmation was in doubt. His accuser was black, so the idea that his assault was based on race was ridiculous. Yet he reached beneath the deck, slipped out the race card, and it ultimately helped him win the contest. That is not what has happened in Obama’s situation. His assaults are real and they have been intensifying since the primaries. Hillary and Bill stealth bombed Obama with it, softening him up so that now the right-wingers can finished the job. They have so viciously attacked him here that he has spent an enormous amount of time, money and effort just to fend them off, effort that no white candidate has had to make. The attacks have hammered his race and religion constantly, and have even included calling him a monkey.</p>
<p>[Bad</a> Ideas: The ‘Racist’ Barack Obama Monkey Puppet](<a href=“http://gawker.com/tag/bad-ideas/?i=5016520&t=the-racist-barack-obama-monkey-puppet]Bad”>http://gawker.com/tag/bad-ideas/?i=5016520&t=the-racist-barack-obama-monkey-puppet)
[Restaurant</a> Owner Under Fire For Obama Monkey Shirts - News Story - KNTV | San Francisco](<a href=“News – NBC Bay Area”>News – NBC Bay Area)</p>
<p>One merely needs Google the terms “Rose garden” and “watermelon patch”, two terms that seem completely innocuous, to see the persistent and widespread racist assault that Obama endures from McCain supporters simply because of his race. This is undoubtedly the “they” Obama has in mind when he talks about the attacks “they” will attempt against him. “They” have already tried it, and still are trying it. It was so obvious to me that even as far back as [January</a> I said it would happen]( <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059720925-post405.html]January”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059720925-post405.html).</p>
<p>How is Obama to combat this, if not by mentioning it? What we are asking him to do here is unreasonable. We demand that he endure the racist fear-mongering, and not say a word about it, while McCain supporters increase their racist assaults. Should he mention the assaults to try disarming them, he is accused of “playing the race card” when in fact he does nothing of the sort. Race is actually being used against him here, openly, unapologetically, and McCain benefits of it. Because McCain supporters are so vigorous with their racist attacks, and because the attacks are so widespread, McCain himself merely needs mention them marginally for them to have an unusually potent effect.</p>
<p>*"In a year when polls show an easy victory for a generic Democratic candidate, McCain has until now been loath to employ the tack many strategists see as essential and which anonymous e-mailers and commenters with no apparent links to his campaign have been practicing since last summer: hitting Obama not on his record or his platform, but on his values and person. </p>
<p>[The</a> Democrat’s Achilles’ heel in this model is an inchoate sense among some voters that the new arrival on the national stage with the unusual biography — who’s the first black nominee from either party — isn’t American enough.](<a href="McCain takes aim at Obama’s character - POLITICO;
<p>We wonder why Obama’s polling numbers are not higher. But I think many of us are simply being dishonest, covering our eyes and ears while a pink, blue spotted elephant runs around defecating among us, and trumpeting “It’s his race, stupid!”.</p>