<p>My experience with band directors is that they are often more bark than bite. I think this was a rule at our school, too, but buses arrived early. It was the students driving in at the last minute, jostling for parking, who were getting there late. But the teacher’s attendance never started on time anyway, despite all his threats. </p>
<p>With a big group of noisy kids, band directors get used to speaking loudly and issuing ultimatums. There just isn’t much opportunity to be soft and gentle. Most band directors I know are usually hoarse by the end of the day. I’ve cringed at some of the things I’ve heard said, but at our school, the kids seem willing to put up with it for the cachet the program brings. (I’ve never figured out why athletes put up with similar treatment. Music, I understand.)</p>
<p>I think there is a natural selection that occurs - when teachers are uniformly bad, kids quit. (That happened at the orchestra at our school. Took a few years for the admin to catch on.) But if the program is growing and doing well, chances are the band directors are doing some good things, too. Keep in mind that some students only tell their parents the bad parts.</p>
<p>I suspect that if a kid had a genuine problem with arriving early, and went to the teacher to discuss options, there would probably be some effort to fix the situation. Maybe the teacher knows of an earlier bus, or a student who would carpool. </p>
<p>The kid could offer to switch to a different band that met later in the day. Then the teacher could decide if that was a preferable option to having a late comer. </p>
<p>Or the kid could offer to warm up at home before coming to school, go to their locker AFTER class, and be seated and ready at the downbeat.</p>
<p>Or the kid could offer to quit band if it was going to bring down the group and his own grade. (You have to try not to say this sarcastically.) We did this once. Offered to pull kid out if our inablility to contribute financially at the level they wanted was going to be a problem. (We were out of money. We were spending far more than most students on music, and just had been bled dry. I think it was only $500 they wanted then; it’s over a thousand now. They want even more from those who march.) Fortunately, they decided that having my kid stay in band was desireable.</p>
<p>But I think the kid has to genuinely make an effort to comply, and the director has to see this. Even though band is offered as an elective, it isn’t a “right”. (My oldest was in drama - we had the transportation issue with him, too, because the “academic class” also required daily after-school time. It was part of the package.)</p>
<p>And kids who are generally well-behaved, talented, and put forth effort (e.g. practicing or taking lessons) are going to get a more favorable response than those who are a regular source of grief.</p>
<p>And, although I do think it is common (unfortunately) among band directors (just like someone mentioned about sports coaches), I do think there is a line that can be crossed. Parents do need to protect their kids, and if yours is especially vulnerable for one reason or another, don’t hesitate to pull him out. On the other hand, if the problem is widespread, and damaging, then, by all means, do what you must. Be careful about bringing down the whole program if the situation doesn’t warrant it, though.</p>