Minority numbers up from last year

<p>

</p>

<p>Is it me, or does it seem as if this “holistic” approach is a way to practice affirmative action, but not by breaking any sort of laws.</p>

<p>Sorta… but, if you take a look at the actual admitted data (as opposed to enrollment data) the numbers aren’t drastically different from previous years. I believe the reason more minorities have submitted their SIRs is due to the extra finaid being thrown at them by outside groups…</p>

<p>

:rolleyes:</p>

<p>Okay, so it was more the yield rate changing, rather than the percentage of applicants accepted that changed?</p>

<p>The yield went from 49% to 56% didn’t it? That doesn’t account for a 100% increase in the African American population of the c/o 2011 vs 2010. Asian American admissions went down 4% and their yield was lower too.</p>

<p>Woot Woot. Ima bruin. </p>

<p>Holla!</p>

<p>Thanks Holistic Review!</p>

<p>I’m a mermaid. :rolleyes:</p>

<p>How holistic were UCLA’s admissions before? Or is this just their way of saying “we’re going to consider ethnicity more from now on”?</p>