MIT most creative of HYPS- This site is an example

<p>To understand how creative MIT is please check this out! </p>

<p><a href=“http://techtv.mit.edu/[/url]”>http://techtv.mit.edu/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>I’d like to agree, especially since I’m MIT class of '11, but in all honesty, techtv is pretty much just a ripoff of Youtube. No great leap of creativity in making it, unfortunately.</p>

<p>It’s definitely a nice thing that MIT has techtv, but I can’t say that it is clever or creative.</p>

<p>Now… as for the videos that are being hosted on techtv? That may be a different story. Many of the videos are very neat! :-)</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Well, I happen to think that Stanford is a pretty darn creative school, especially when it comes to technology innovation. I think that MIT and Stanford are basically on par with each other in terms of tech creativity.</p>

<p>yeah it is just a rip off of youtube, i don’t understand what’s so creative? I think the videos themselves are really creative and show that MIT students like to actively do crazy cool science stuff.</p>

<p>I wouldn’t say MIT is more creative than any of the others it’s just a different style of creativity (notably crazy science stuff). </p>

<p>btw one of the key youtube founders was a Stanford grad student! so I wouldn’t say MIT is “more creative than HYPS”</p>

<p>haha the title is funny…MIT is creative of HYPS, when mit is not part of HYPS. HYPMS maybe lol</p>

<p>It’s pretty obvious what they meant but you are probably right it should read HYPMS.
Does Stanford have a Medialab too?</p>

<p>Approximately, Stanford defines Silicon Valley, while MIT defines Route 128. In terms of innovation, Silicon Valley beats Route 128 by a couple of miles. Hence …</p>