<p>runnersmom, kudos to your hs., but in the wider scheme of things, Marian makes a good point - most schools do not have the resources to create or offer rigorous college prep. courses that can easily take the place of AP courses. (To add to Marian’s latest comment - I agree that the resources they do have most likely can be better used.) Case in point, Scarsdale HS because this school does offer a panoply of excellent upper level courses - only one of which is AP. </p>
<p>epiphany, exactly - it is this shift from motivation to “place out” to motivation for admissions reasons that blurs the issues here. This is why I agree with Marian’s assessment that the message is not not to take AP courses. Nonetheless, there are a great many students who are encouraged to take AP exams (here, I am making a distinction between the exam and the course) and one of the prime reasons is for good old “advanced placement” - in Texas, for example, there is an incentive program that pays $100 to students to take the test, since most Texas colleges and universities will give students college credit for AP courses if they score 3 or higher. Same trend can be observed in other states, including NJ and NY so that increasing larger numbers of high school students tackle not just college-level material but go on to take the test - in order to earn college course credit. If colleges, especially highly selective, elites opt to create policy that, defacto, sends the clear message that their departments do not honor the AP exam (even for scores of 4 and 5) for intro level placement and choose to give their own placement test in lieu of the AP, then I do wonder if a message will be sent to the effect that it is not necessary to load up on APs exams. Of course, I do realize that they are quite a number of motivated, interested students out there who do want to take the AP exam just to rise to the challenge and I do not think that that is at issue here.</p>