More from the race to nowhere...

<p>I don’t agree with the dichotomy set up, that lots of homework = busywork. It is possible to have good homework. For example, if the homework includes reading for class the next day, it creates more interesting classes. </p>

<p>“Going outside to play” sounds great, but realistically, for many American kids, the extra time would be devoted to video games and tv. See the Kaiser Family Foundation study of children’s media habits:

<a href=“http://www.kff.org/entmedia/mh012010pkg.cfm[/url]”>http://www.kff.org/entmedia/mh012010pkg.cfm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Really, if they can spend 7 hours a day on entertainment media, they could devote some of that time to homework.</p>

<p>I also think that really bright kids need the opportunity to work hard. It is all too easy to skate through some schools, without learning to manage your time. Native brilliance is great, until you encounter a workload which requires a disciplined approach. Far better to realize that you can’t delay a large project to the night before it’s due.</p>

<p>On the other hand, there is a level of self-assigned work which is ridiculous. In the Wall Street Journal’s article today about the canceling of SAT scores from a NY high school:</p>

<p>

[SAT</a> Scores Tossed Out in Testing Site Glitch - WSJ.com](<a href=“http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303448404577408630792009046.html?mod=googlenews_wsj]SAT”>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303448404577408630792009046.html?mod=googlenews_wsj)</p>

<p>A practice test lasts an hour. For the past month, he’s been spending two hours a day preparing for an SAT subject test? And his chemistry class has been test prep? This has nothing to do with homework load, and everything to do with cutthroat college competition.</p>