<p>A few important points:</p>
<ul>
<li>This is an all-girls HS.</li>
<li>This is a tiny school (~300 total)</li>
<li>This appears to be a Catholic school</li>
<li>The senior prom is one week later than junior prom.</li>
</ul>
<p>I also went to a Catholic girls HS (small, but not as small) and we had the same policy, though it did change very recently, so now girls can go “stag”. The other Catholic girls HS (smaller than mine) in our area had the same policy. At “date dances”, we could invite male dates from any other HS, but we had to submit their names, contact info, etc., as Lafalum describes. At “open dances”, attendance was open to all students (male and female) from the other Catholic schools in the city (there were four total…two all-girls, one all-boys, one co-ed), and typically, no guests were permitted.</p>
<ul>
<li><p>As mentioned in the article, requiring dates does boost attendance (and thus, presumably, ticket sales…who knows the finances involved in this event?).</p></li>
<li><p>Because the boys are coming in from other schools, there simply can’t be an “open door” policy. Lafalum, I’d say that in essence, this is very similar to your daughter’s school’s policy…not opposite at all. At a girls school, any male date will have to be an “outsider”, whether or not the school requires him to be there. I’m sure these girls will also have to submit names/permission/contracts/etc. for their dates.</p></li>
<li><p>Again…this is a Catholic school. The fact that this policy is unfair to same-sex couples is likely a non-issue in the eyes of those enacting it. It could be the motivating issue, but that’s certainly not clear. Unless same-sex couples are a pervasive “issue” at this school, my assumption is that the administration would simply turn a blind eye, but maybe that’s the wishful Californian in me.</p></li>
<li><p>A senior girl in the article is quoted as saying that she only found out about the policy that day, and she’s going to her prom the next day. So if the policy was indeed enacted at the last minute, it may simply have been too late to apply it to the senior prom (though IMO, one week’s notice also sounds too late to apply it to the junior event). Perhaps junior ticket sales were lagging and the event was going to be too much of a money-loser, so it’s a choice between requiring dates and canceling. Not enough info to say, but I can’t imagine other reasons that it would apply to juniors only.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>I don’t have strong feelings one way or the other, probably because this was always normal for me. People complained, but we understood the point. Interestingly, the policy was changed once my HS grew pretty dramatically in size, so I do wonder if finances/attendance played a more major role than the article suggests (if so, I don’t know why the school wouldn’t just say so, but in my mind, that’s kind of true in general here). </p>
<p>I noticed (by googling to make sure the school had a Catholic mission) that there’s also a St. Peter’s boys school in Staten Island which is part of the same parish. If the issue is financial/attendance, then in theory, the school could let girls come stag, let girls bring male dates from whatever school they chose, and invite the St. Peters boys to come stag, or throw a joint prom. Then again, Wikipedia suggests that St. Peters boys school is about 2.5x the size of St. Peter’s girls school, so maybe that’s not ideal, either. Who knows.</p>
<p>Bottom-line: I don’t think that this article gives enough info to really illuminate the situation. Maybe there’s something weird going on (plenty of evidence to believe so), but not necessarily. And I can guarantee that in at least one other part of the country, this–poor timing, aside–is totally normal.</p>
<p>Regarding the girls talking to the press, I will say that when it comes to religious schools, particularly if they’re directly affiliated with a diocese, there can be restrictions to freedom of speech, because to some degree, students are representatives of the church. Obviously I don’t know if that’s the issue here, but since the “What about same-sex couples?” question is such an obvious one, it seems possible</p>