<p>“It sounds like you want the music degree a lot more than he does.”</p>
<p>That’s a complete and snarky guess. You should see his musical resume. He is the one studying Mahler scores and listening to Mahler symphonies while we drive to his chamber music class where he is currently playing the Arensky Trio. He is the one who loves to be the rehearsal pianist for his school’s musicals. He is the one who went out of his comfort zone and added concert choir in his senior year and will be auditioning for all-state today. He is the one who wrote and is playing music for Antigone, a play his school is doing this weekend.</p>
<p>The problem is actually the other way around. Everyone tells him that he cannot make a career in music as if all he wants to do is to become a touring concert pianist. This is especially true if the student shows any signs of ability in other academic areas. The problem is that it’s too easy to close musical doors. I’m trying to counteract that input. If I was pushing him into music, he would be applying to a conservatory or SOM. Now that he will not be applying for the Michigan dual degree, the problem of closing musical doors becomes even more of a problem.</p>
<p>Underlying a lot of discussions of education is a conflict between nature and nurture. There is a fine line between pushing and mentoring. There is also a difference between passion and initiative. Some think that if a student has the appropriate passion for a subject, then initiative will automatically follow; that one will be a success simply because of that passion. I completely disagree with this. My son has passion for lots of things, but that doesn’t mean that he has the knowledge or experience to ensure success in any of those areas. As a parent, I have to do a lot of work to show him the different possibilities in each area. Should he be the one to get on CC and ask all of these questions? If he doesn’t, does that mean that he doesn’t have the proper passion for the subject or that the parent is pushing? Too many have this sort of passion litmus test. They feel that if one has the appropriate passion, then they will do anything to get the job done. In other words, if they don’t get the job done, then they don’t have the appropriate passion. I call it the passion trap. It’s also an excuse for bad teaching. </p>
<p>Don’t get me started on how much help I had to give him in math in K-8.</p>
<p>So, are mentors and good teachers not important? Do they just teach skills and musicality? Do they not push? Does the need for pushing imply a lack of passion? We’re back on the Tiger Mom issue (which was really about something else). My son’s piano teacher taught him very well in the area of skills and musicality. He did not, however, push him to learn the skills of recording flawless performances. Was my son supposed to figure out how important this skill is for opportunities all by himself? He had to. He has a flawless attitude about performing, but those skills don’t translate very well to recording skills.</p>
<p>I’ve had to deal with the helicopter parent epithet since my son was little. Teachers love to use it as a way to control parents. While there are many real cases of parents pushing against their kids’ wills, The ploy is often used indiscriminately.</p>
) I know when my son was looking at MIT at the time they didn’t accept any AP credit at all…</p>