<p>I have a high stats kid so safeties and matches are what I’m focusing on. </p>
<p>@GMTplus7 The school cited above is one that she sould be thrilled to go to. We visited it and she loved it. It has wonderful study abroad programs in her field of interest and one of the top scholars in her area on the faculty. I’ve been thinking that I could call it a safety but the national admit rate made me cringe. Which school specific acceptance rates are you considering matches? She has two safeties according to naviance school info and her stats and one with a guaranteed scholarship. That’s enough, eh?</p>
<p>@ubcalumnus The very first thing I have done when she mentions a school she’s interested in is run the NPC. If it asks for SAT and GPA and includes estimated merit and is still unaffordable, it’s toast. Her intended major is not a popular one. It’s often one that people make fun of, actually! (which is stupid, but whatever) But all colleges on her list have well developed programs in it. The school that I cited above has a honors college that, while very interesting, would interfere with study abroad opportunities due to required seminars. Should she write the essay for it anyway and apply as a way of showing interest, even if she wouldn’t accept the offer? The topic is an easy one for her because it poses a philosophical question.</p>
<p>If it’s a school with a 50% or higher national admit rate, I go to the scattergram. If there are outliers who’ve been waitlisted and denied, it also gets taken of the list, unless she really loves it. Because who need to fall victim of yield protection?</p>
<p>But I must say that this tool is very reassuring. I just don’t want to overstate her chances. I do look at the scattergrams and when I notice a lower stat acceptance I ask her if she knows who it was. She usually does and it’s always someone hooked. </p>
<p>An interesting thing happens when you start scrutinizing data. At a JHU info session, a parent asked about SAT scores. The rep said, “They are less important than you think they are and more important than you want them to be.” I thought that was a good answer in that it seemed to placate the parent without discouraging applicants. But when I look at the data from my kid’s school at least, it shows a pretty clear picture. For instance, 28 kids with 2100+ SAT applied to JHU. Nineteen (68%) of them got in. So indeed, SATs are no guarantee. Everyone knows this. It’s drilled into every kid’s head from the minute they get their score report. The PROBLEM is that kids with low score are thinking the same thing. From my kid’s school, there were 31 kids over the same time period with LESS than 2000 SAT who also applied to JHU. Five were admitted (16%). </p>
<p>My takeaway from this data is, unless there is something really compelling about the rest of your application, (and it’s usually something the applicant has no control over, like being a refugee or a wealthy student from Senegal) or you’re a recruited athlete, don’t bother applying with low SATs.</p>
<p>High stats don’t ensure admission, but low ones almost certainly keep you out.</p>