<p>Anyone heard of it…is it different from other kinds of debate and how…</p>
<p>It seems to work on style of debate, and a bit less on substance, but I could be wrong</p>
<p>opppsssssss</p>
<p>I guess nobody noes nuttin</p>
<p>it’s a intercollegiate audience friendly debate format - <a href=“http://www.neda.us%5B/url%5D”>www.neda.us</a></p>
<p>Thanks,…I saw the website, but are they competitive, is it considered “Real” debate, or “debate light”</p>
<p>It’s real debate - unless by “real” you mean what CEDA is now. It is based on what CEDA was when it began. Teams use tons of evidence, but delivery is also a factor as opposed to speed of delivery. Watch a video of one of the final rounds and you can see for yourself.</p>
<p>I have read that delivery is more important than content</p>
<p>Part of it depends on who you’ve heard it from :-). You can get disqualified for delivery, but the judges decide based on evidence. Your delivery can make a judge more favorable or less favorable to you, but it’s not forensics.</p>