New York Times: UCLA Rescinds Admission to Early Peakers (URSA)

<p>I just read an article from the new york times that says that UCLA will rescind admission to those who signed up for URSA early. I am freaking out!</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/17/business/uclaearlydecision.html?_r=1&ref=us[/url]”>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/17/business/uclaearlydecision.html?_r=1&ref=us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>This has got to be the most epic topic I have ever seen on CC.</p>

<p>You sir just shortened many people’s lifespans.</p>

<p>=D!</p>

<p>oops i crapped my pants. seriously though</p>

<p>i wish we could hand out rep on this board.</p>

<p>lol why would the new york times have anything to write about a school in LA? at least try putting it in the LA times next time…</p>

<p>Yeah, what the hell? I would have been happy if I had gotten the opportunity to accidentally listen to “Never Gonna Give You Up” for the thousandth time.</p>

<p>ny times just called me and said they rescinded the article because people from college discussion kept calling them asking to chance them.</p>

<p>good times…</p>

<p>I am just trying to kill the wait till admission decisions.</p>

<p>Does this make me a <=====#3 ?</p>

<p>my heart stopped</p>

<p>LOL.</p>

<p>Good one…</p>

<p>A…junk with a tic tac toe tattoo? Yes, it does.</p>

<p>I didn’t need you guys to suffer too much. Reading the title, I am sure, is suffering enough.</p>

<p>btw, peakers is actually spelled peekers lol</p>

<p>The tic tack toe is the hairy part of the balls.</p>

<p>

Too bad peekers isn’t a real word either.</p>

<p>haha that’s actually true…but just in general, the word peek would apply here, not peak</p>

<p>peekers… yes, you are right.</p>

<p>I think this is a joke,right? the time you posted is not yet 4/17, but the link is timed as 4/17…
I had a heart attack though:(
NOT A NICE JOKE</p>

<p>I wonder what chesser would have to say about this…</p>

<p>I think chesser killed himself. Seriously.</p>