<p>This site has a compilation of different polls:</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.realclearpolitics.com/latestpolls/[/url]”>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/latestpolls/</a></p>
<p>This site has a compilation of different polls:</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.realclearpolitics.com/latestpolls/[/url]”>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/latestpolls/</a></p>
<p>Thanks. That’s a great site.</p>
<p>Also see <a href=“Pollster”>Pollster;
<p>And their blog is by seveal political scientists and is read by many journalists.</p>
<p>^^Good one.</p>
<p>I prefer pollster.com over realclearpolitics; the latter sticks its editorial shiv in at times.</p>
<p>Congressional Quarterly (<a href=“http://www.CQPolitics.com%5B/url%5D”>www.CQPolitics.com</a>) and The Cook Political Report (<a href=“http://www.cookpolitical.com%5B/url%5D”>www.cookpolitical.com</a>) are both worthwhile. <a href=“http://www.pollingreport.com%5B/url%5D”>www.pollingreport.com</a> is good for getting all sorts of snapshots, particularly of things like poll-to-poll comparisons over time…you look at the numbers and you begin to discount Hotline by a point or three in one direction, be wary of Newsweek by the same margin in the other direction. Though Republican, Rassmussen Reports gives a very nice long-baseline look at Presidential approval.</p>
<p>I know I should put my reading glasses on- or else adjust my screen
everytime I see this header I think that somehow a spam mail got posted to CC and it says Website for erection pills</p>
<p>Interesting poll-wonkery at <a href=“http://politicalarithmetik.blogspot.com/[/url]”>http://politicalarithmetik.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Lol, Ek. Might be more interesting… :eek:</p>
<p>Ek, it’s possible that’s a Freudian slip.</p>
<p>But what it means…someone else will have to post that up. :D</p>