My son likes Yale. This dad is not confident Yale will like him quite as much. Forgive me for being cynical, but I question whether HYPS tier is a realistic option for this unhooked kid with strong stats and academic record but garden-variety ECs. Should I encourage junior to apply SCEA?
Here are the bare details:
ACT: 36 Composite (single sitting, 10 writing)
SAT II: US history (800), Eng lit (750).
GPA (uw) 4.0
GPA (w): 4.9
Class rank: probably 1 or 2/300 (school might only officially report top 10).
Public school in midwestern USA (title I school due to low income and high ESL student body). Sends 1-3 kids/year to top 30 selective colleges. Definitely NOT feeder school to elites.
APS: 10 APs by end of junior year, all 5s except for one oops (3 in spanish)
9th grade: World history (5), Euro history (5)
10th grade: Human Geo (5), AP bio (5)
11th grade APUSH (5), AP Eng language (5), AP Eng lit (5), AP Chem (5), AB calculus (5), AP spanish (3… ¡Que gringo! May not report this one)
12th grade: AP US govt, AP econ, BC calculus, AP physics, AP art history, AP environmental science
=(16 APs by end senior year)
Demographics: white male. Weak legacy (Yale grandparent, uncles) which probably counts for little or nothing. Bulldog blue blood too diluted to help, I think.
Will require financial aid.
Region: Great Lakes region, midwest USA
ECs
Cross country (4 years, captain for 2 years, all conference)
XC skiing (4 years, captain for 2 years, all conference)
Ultimate frisbee (2 years)
Summer Shakespeare troupe, actor (3 years)
Peer tutoring (actually quite intense and personally meaningful…not fluff EC)
Works as restaurant busboy and caregiver in church nursery
Honors and Awards
AP scholar
NM commended
A bunch of school and district awards for academic and athletics
Nothing major out of school except awards based on AP and ACT scores
Now to the unquantifiable stuff…(Warning: long post ahead. Turn back now unless you are a serious CC geek).
My take: academic stats sufficient for any elite school, but nothing that makes him uniquely attractive any elite school. To my eye, his ECs seem fairly ordinary in this applicant pool.
To me, the biggest hurdle comes when the adcoms ask “what will this student contribute to our campus?” His main EC has been sports (15-20 hrs/wk) but he does not have Div 1 level athletic talent—and thus no applicability in college. Athletics has been great for character, leadership, discipline, and lasting friendships, but I can’t see much advantage for admissions. No recruiting potential. He has focused on a few meaningful ECs and scoffs at resume-padding activities–hence no fluff list of clubs, startups, volunteering, etc. No strategically-constructed demonstrations of "passion” nor gimmicky demonstrations of “uniqueness.” His ECs do not translate into any importable skill like orchestra, newspaper, etc. that allow adcoms to imagine him contributing the same activity on campus. (I am certain he WILL be active in ECs in college, but they will be new activities). A friend who teaches at one of the HYPS univs (and previously taught at two others) put it to me bluntly: "most kids here are really good at something.” That does not inspire confidence in chances of unhooked, rounded kid, from undistinguished school—even with good numbers.
My question boils down to this—should I encourage this young man in his plans to apply early to Yale? Or, given absence of outlier EC achievements or other hook, is HYPS tier unlikely and should he aim lower? Would he be better advised to focus his energies (and perhaps commit ED) to another of his top picks in lower selectivity band?
I wonder whether adcoms at top selective schools will look at his athletics and think, “unremarkable performance in activities to which he devoted most of his time.” I wonder if his love for Yale isn’t likely to be reciprocated due to surplus of strong candidates who DO advance institutional priorities or have demonstrated remarkable EC talents. Or is this dad (perhaps jaded by too much time on CC) being too pessimistic about lack of wow extracurriculars?
Those are my questions. Now a bit of context:
My son is not attached to any dream school. Yale is his top pick at the moment, but I predict he could be successful and happy at wide range of colleges. His major remains undecided, but I would expect something along lines of economics, history or psychology with eventual career in business or law. His main aspiration is to go to the best school he can reach for academics, diverse and interesting peers, resources and financial aid. Social life and school spirit matter to him, which is why he is attracted to Yale more than its peer schools. He is well-liked by peers and teachers. In college, I expect he will throw himself into intramural sports and some entirely new social ECs.
I am not sure how to advise this boy. Aim high or go for a surer bet a bit lower down? Where he applies will be his decision, of course, but he is looking to adults for guidance. We have almost no precedent in his peer group. His HS (urban school with large percentage of low income, ESL and refugees) sends very few kids to selective colleges. Naviance simply doesn’t have enough data to tell us anything useful. Our school’s academic profile probably looks pretty unimpressive due to low-income population and low schoolwide test scores; as a consequence, admissions officers will not be accustomed to taking our students. I’m not sure if that makes his achievements more impressive in context or makes our kids more likely to be not taken seriously and passed over. There is no “working relationship” between GC and admissions like you might find in more affluent feeder schools, so we can’t count on having effective advocates at either end of this process (and those working relationships make a big difference in ANY business). Guidance counselors are well-intentioned good folks, but overworked and not so savvy about selective admissions. People here in CC seem more knowledgable so I am hoping for some realistic evaluation. I won’t discourage my son from shooting for the stars but I want to give him a realistic evaluation of his strengths and weaknesses as an applicant—and tradeoffs of aiming very high vs not quite so high. As you can see, my evaluation of chances at top tier is not very optimistic at the moment.
I’ve looked at past CC results threads which only confirm what is probably obvious to all you CC cognoscenti—that stats put my son in the running for top schools, but his ECs are nothing special…and that lots of kids with even better stats get rejected…and some with worse stats get admitted…and that key differentiators are things that can’t be evaluated here (essays, recs, institutional priorities)…and that special talents seem to make a difference…That last one is what concerns me. Probably wise commentators will repeat variations of these observations. But I gotta ask anyway, just in case we might learn something or see glimmers of hope that I am not seeing now.
Sorry for long post! Thanks to those who endured to the end.